نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 کارشناسی ارشد مطالعات آسیای مرکزی و قفقاز جنوبی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار گروه علوم سیاسی دانشگاه دفاع ملی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
بیثباتی و منازعه هیچگاه کلیدواژهای غریب برای توصیف وضعیت امنیتی قفقاز جنوبی نبوده است. دلایل متنوعی برای این ویژگی بیان شده، هدف این پژوهش، پرداختن به مهمترین مولفههای درونمنطقهای موثر بر این ترتیبات است. روش پژوهش این تحقیق استقرایی، در کنار روش تحلیل اسنادی کیفی و همچنین بر اساس روش گردآوری کتابخانهای و مبانی نظری واقعگرایی نوکلاسیک است. یافتههای پژوهش ماحصل سه مولفه اصلی و شش شاخص هستند. این یافتهها در مولفه «ساختار قدرت منطقهای» (متشکل از دو شاخص «توزیع قدرت» و «قطببندی») به توزیع نامتوازن قدرت و فقدان قدرت خوشخیم درونی یا برونمنطقهای در قطببندی میان جمهوریهای منطقه میپردازند. در مولفه «عامل اقتصادی» (متشکل از دو شاخص «وابستگی متقابل اقتصادی (تجارت)» و «مشارکت در مسیرهای انتقال انرژی») به وابستگی اقتصادی بسیار اندک و سیاست حذف رقیب از خطوط انتقال انرژی توجه شده است. در مولفه نهایی «عامل نظامی – امنیتی» (متشکل از «مناقشات سرزمینی» و «تنشهای قومی») به مناقشات سرزمینی جانیفتاده و ویژگی خاص تنشهای قومی که موجب بدبینی به محیط خارجی میشوند، اشاره دارند. تمرکز صرف بر مولفههای درونمنطقهای نوآوری این پژوهش بوده است. در نتیجه باید اشاره کرد که این مولفهها خود فارغ از عوامل بیرونی، عاملی برای ناکارآمدی ترتیبات امنیتی منطقه از منظر ثباتآفرینی هستند.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Intra-Regional Factors Affecting the Regional Security Arrangements in the South Caucasus
نویسندگان [English]
- Soroush Shabani Khatibani 1
- Ali Alizadeh 2
1 LLM, Regional Studies of Central Asia and the South Caucasus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Supreme National Defense University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction
The South Caucasus region—comprising Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia—has long been a focal point of geopolitical tension and instability. The current study aimed to explore the significant intra-regional factors affecting security arrangements in the South Caucasus. It tried to answer the following research question: What are the effects of the most important intra-regional factors on the security arrangements in the South Caucasus?
Literature Review
Numerous studies have explored the intra-regional causes influencing the security arrangements in the South Caucasus. For instance, in “The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict and Security in the Caucasus,” German (2012) identified several key intra-regional factors, including the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute, historical animosity, diverse strategic orientations, and limited cooperation at the state level. Cornell (2017) pointed to persistent territorial conflicts, external threats, and the evolving relationships of South Caucasus republics with regional and great powers as complicating factors for regional security. Chechelashvili (2021) highlights conflict zones, potential for economic cooperation, regional organizations, and the influence of major world powers as intra-regional determinants of security, also noting Georgia’s potential to foster regional stability.
The article “Russian and Turkish Approaches to Security Arrangements in the South Caucasus” (Hoseinzadeh et al., 2018) identified conflict resolution, the development of a multilateral trust regime, and intra-regional economic growth as crucial intra-regional components. In “South Caucasus Security Arrangements: Future Opportunities and Challenges,” Jafarinia et al. (2023) focused on the Karabakh conflict and the economic development of the countries in the region. Moreover, in “On Regional Security Governance Once Again,” Ceccorulli (2016) examined domestic factors and highlighted the Karabakh issue, energy security, and the significant but limited role of private sector actors. The literature converges on a central issue, that is, a relative lack of in-depth focus on the intra-regional determinants of security arrangements. While these factors are mentioned, the existing literature often fails to elaborate on them, leaving a discernible gap in research.
Materials and Methods
This research employed a descriptive method complemented by qualitative document analysis. Neoclassical realism was used as the theoretical framework. The process began with identifying the main topic areas, followed by selecting relevant documents and categorizing them according to the research questions. Using a bottom-up approach, three main elements with six indicators were developed based on theoretical models. The analysis proceeded in three stages: (1) initial screening, which involved a quick summary of qualitative and quantitative information; (2) intensive reading, dedicated to meticulous examination for extracting key information organized into important elements; and (3) final interpretation, where facts were matched to address the research questions. Relying on library sources and statistical data, the study employed triangulation—combining descriptive analysis with qualitative document analysis—to ensure the reliability and validity of findings.
Results and Discussion
The regional power structure was examined through two primary indicators, namely the distribution of power among the three republics and the level of regional polarization. According the results, the distribution of power among Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia is inherently asymmetrical, driven by significant disparities in both hard
power (military capacity) and soft power (economic capacity). This imbalance has yielded two critical security outcomes. First, dominant states—such as Azerbaijan in its conflict with Armenia, or separatist actors in Georgia—possess a higher probability of success, which incentivizes them to initiate conflicts. Second, weaker states often seek to restore equilibrium by forging alliances with external powers, thereby embedding regional disputes within the geopolitical rivalries of extra-regional actors. Regarding polarization, the analysis highlighted the divergent foreign policy orientations of the three states: Georgia’s pro-Western tendency, Armenia’s alignment with Russia, and Azerbaijan’s more balanced approach. Consequently, no single internal or external actor has managed to incentivize the South Caucasian states to adopt a bandwagoning policy, which remains the primary mechanism that could otherwise reduce uncertainty and enhance stability in the region.
The economic factors shaping regional security were examined in two broad respects: the level of interdependence between the republics and their roles in energy transmission lines. Research indicates that this interdependence is surprisingly low, particularly between Armenia and Azerbaijan, which limits the scope for cooperation and conflict resolution. In addition, energy transmission lines are of crucial significance to the geopolitical standing of the region. Efforts to reduce dependence on Russia and the willingness to undermine Armenia are highlighted, a strategy referred to as elimination policy. This low level of economic interdependence suggests that internal groups seeking stability for economic gain have minimal influence on the foreign policy of these nations.
The military-security factor was examined through two critical indicators: territorial disputes and ethnic tensions. The interplay
between these two can escalate ethnic tensions—as seen in the Karabakh conflict and the 2008 Georgia war—into full-blown territorial disputes and total wars. These intense disputes remain unresolved, aligning with William Zartman’s ripeness theory. The historical legacy of the Soviet era, coupled with deep-seated ethnic tensions in the region, significantly fuels these conflicts. Furthermore, the current regional power structure—marked by an imbalanced distribution of power and a lack of bandwagoning policies—fosters a sense of potential victory among stronger parties. Ethnic tensions impact regional security in two primary ways: first, through state actions towards its minorities, and second, through transborder ethnic minorities. These groups include the Kists, Javakheti Armenians, Ahiska Turks, and Georgian Azeris in the region, as well as the Lezgins and Talysh communities in Azerbaijan. Such tensions not only exacerbate existing disputes but also have the potential to ignite new ones. This complicates the establishment of lasting security agreements by fostering leaders’ negative perceptions and a pessimistic strategic culture towards external relations and foreign collaboration, particularly in security matters.
Conclusion
This research identified and analyzed three primary intra-regional factors shaping the security arrangements in the South Caucasus. They include the regional power structure, economic factors, and military-security factors. Each of these factors was further divided into indicators that would build up the overall security environment of the region. The examination of intra-regional factors affecting the security arrangements in the South Caucasus revealed a complex interplay of
variables contributing to regional instability. The convergence of factors creates a nuanced security dilemma that is not easily resolved and necessitates a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach to achieve regional stability and cooperation.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Security Arrangements
- South Caucasus
- Regional Power Structure
- Economic Factors
- Military-security Factors
منابع
- جعفرینیا، عباس و همکاران، (1402)، «ترتیبات امنیتی ناظر بر قفقاز جنوبی (فرصتها و چالشهای آینده)»، آیندهپژوهی دفاعی، دوره 8، شماره 28،
https://doi.org/10.22034/DFSR.2023.1987369.1673.
- حسین زاده، شجاع و همکاران، (1397)، «رویکرد روسیه و ترکیه به ترتیبات امنیتی در قفقاز جنوبی»، جامعهشناسی سیاسی ایران، دوره 1، شماره 4،
https://doi.org/10.0.119.46/psi.2021.295903.2117.
- سیدامامی، کاووس، (1386)، پژوهش در علوم سیاسی: رویکردهای اثباتگرا، تفسیری و انتقادی، تهران: دانشگاه امام صادق (ع).
- صوراناری، حسین، (1395)، جمهوری آذربایجان: منابع انرژی و رژیم حقوقی، در کولایی، الهه و علیزاده، شیوا، جستارهای پیرامون مسائل دریای خزر، تهران: اداره نشر وزارت امور خارجه.
- علیزاده، علی، (1400)، «جایگاه جمهوری اسلامی ایران در ترتیبات امنیتی قفقاز»، ایران و همسایگان، تهران: پژوهشکده امنیت ملی، 26-16، https://sndu.ac.ir/fa/news/5372.
- کوزهگر کالجی، ولی، (1396)، مجموعه امنیتی قفقاز جنوبی، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
- کولایی، الهه، (1396)، سیاست و حکومت در اوراسیای مرکزی، تهران: سمت.
References
- Askerov, Ali & Ibadoghlu, Gubad, (2022), “The Causes and Consequences of the Second Karabakh War: September 27, 2021–November 10, 2021”, In Hakan Yavuz, & Michael Gunter (ed), The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: Historical and Political Perspectives, London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003261209.
- Aydingűn, Ayşegül, (2002), “Ahiska (Meskhetian) Turks: Source of Conflict in the Caucasus?”, The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 6, No. 2, https//doi.org/10.1080/714003762.
- Beacháin, Donnacha & Coene, Frederik, (2014), “Go West: Georgia's European Identity and Its Role in Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy Objectives”, Nationalities Papers, Vol. 42, No. 6, https:// doi. org: 10. 1080/00905992.2014.953466.
- Berglund, Christofer, (2022), “Accepting Alien Rule? State-Building Nationalism in Georgia's Azeri Borderland”, In Cindy Wittke, Post-Soviet Conflict Potentials, London: Routledge.
- Bowen, Glenn, (2009), “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method”, Qualitative Research Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2.
- Brawley, Mark, (2009), “Neoclassical Realism and Strategic Calculations: Explaining Divergent British, French, and Soviet Strategies Toward Germany Between the World Wars (1919–1939)”, In Lobell, Steven, et al., (ed), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ceccorulli, Michela et al., (2016), “On Regional Security Governance Once Again: How Analysis of the Southern Caucasus Can Advance the Concept”, European Security, Vol. 26, No. 1, 59-78. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/09662839.2016.1252755.
- Chechelashvili, Valeri, (2020), “South Caucasus in The Network of International Relations”, Actual Problems of International Relations, Vol. 1, No. 145, https:// doi. org/ 10. 17721/ apmv.2020.145.1.28-43.
- Cornell, Svante & Starr, Frederick, (2009), The Guns of August 2008: Russia's War in Georgia, New York: Routledge, https:// doi.org/ 10.4324/9781315699660.
- Cornell, Svante, (2017), “Security Threats and Challenges in the Caucasus after 9/11”, In Ariel Cohen (ed), Eurasia in Balance, London: Routledge.
- Dalalyan, Tork, (2011), “Construction of Kurdish and Yezidi Identities Among the Kurmanj-speaking Population of the Republic of Armenia”, In Khutsishvili, Sophia & Horan, John (ed), Changing Identities: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Tbilisi: Heinrich Böll Stiftung South Caucasus.
- De Waal, Thomas, (2019), The Caucasus: An Introduction, 2nd Edition, New York: Oxford University Press.
- Ergun, Ayça, (2023), “Turkey and the South Caucasus: Role of Memory and Perceptions in Shaping Turkey’s Relations with Regional States”, In Binnur Özkeçeci-Taner & Sinem Akgül Açıkmeşe (ed), One Hundred Years of Turkish Foreign Policy (1923-2023) Historical and Theoretical Reflections, Palgrave Macmillan.
- German, Tracey, (2012), “Good Neighbours or Distant Relatives? Regional Identity and Cooperation in the South Caucasus”, Central Asian Survey, Vol. 31, No. 2, 137-151. https:// doi. org/ 10.1080/ 02634937. 2012.671990.
- Gorsky, Martin & Mold, Alex, (2020), “Documentary Analysis”, In Catherine Pope & Nicholas Mays (ed), Qualitative Research in Health Care, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 4th Edition, 83-96 https:// doi.org/ 10.1002/9781119410867.ch7.
- Grebennikov, Marat, (2015), “Skating on Thin Ice: Israel's Strategic Partnership with Azerbaijan in the South Caucasus”, Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, Vol. 9, No. 3, https:// doi. org/ 10.1080/ 23739770. 2015.1127054.
- Hunter, Shireen, (2017), “Middle East Actors and Politics: Impact on the South Caucasus”, In Shireen Hunter (ed), The New Geopolitics of the South Caucasus: Prospects for Regional Cooperation and Conflict Resolution, Rowman & Littlefield.
- IISS, (2022), The Military Balance 2022, International Institute for Strategic Studies, London: Routledge.
- IISS, (2024), The Military Balance 2024, International Institute for Strategic Studies, London: Routledge.
- Ikenberry, John, (2005), “Power and liberal Liberal order: America's Postwar World Order in Transition”, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 5, No. 2, https:// doi. org/ 10.1093/irap/lci112.
- Kabachnik, Peter, (2012), “Wounds That Won't Heal: Cartographic Anxieties and the Quest for Territorial Integrity in Georgia”, Central Asian Survey, Vol. 31, No. 3, https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02634937. 2012.647842.
- Kazantsev, Andrei, et al., (2020), “Russia’s Policy in the “Frozen Conflicts” of the Post-Soviet Space: from Ethno-Politics to Geopolitics”, Caucasus Survey, Vol. 8, No. 2, 142-162. https:// doi. org/ 10.1080/ 23761199.2020.1728499.
- Khansari Fard, Fahimeh et al., (2019), “Ethnic Bargaining and Separatism in the South Caucasus”, Region, Vol. 8, No. 2.
- Larres, Klaus, (2009), “The United States and European Integration, 1945–1990”, In Klaus Larres (ed), A Companion to Europe since Since 1945, West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd..
- Lobell, Steven, (2009), “Threat Assessment, the The State, and Foreign Policy: A Neoclassical Realist Model”, In Steven Lobell, et al., (ed), Neoclassical Realism, The State, and Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lobell, Steven et al., (2009), “Introduction: Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy”, In Steven Lobell, et al., (ed), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Markedonov, S & Suchkov, M, (2020), “Russia and the United States in the Caucasus: Cooperation and Competition”, Caucasus Survey, Vol. 8, No. 2, doi:10.1080/23761199.2020.1732101.
- Mogalakwena, Monageng, (2006), “The Use of Documentary Research Methods in Social Research”, African Sociological Review/Revue Africaine De Sociologie, Vol. 10, No. 1, 221-230.
- Narizny, Kevin, (2017), “On Systemic Paradigms and Domestic Politics: A Critique of the Newest Realism”, International Security, Vol. 42, No. 2, https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00296.
- Niculescu, George Vlad, (2015), “Sailing the South Caucasus through Through Troubled Waters towards Regional Integration”, Connections, Vol. 14, No. 2, Retrieved December 18, 2024, from https:// www. jstor.org/stable/26326398.
- O′Leary, Zina, (2017), The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project, London: Sage, 3rd Edition.
- Ripsman, Norrin, (2009), “Neoclassical Realism and Domestic Interest Groups”, In Steven Lobell et al. (ed), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ripsman, Norrin et al., (2016), Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Roberts, Sea & Ziemer, Ulrike, (2018), “Explaining the Pattern of Russian Authoritarian Diffusion in Armenia”, East European Politics, Vol. 34, No. 2, https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 21599165.2018.1457525.
- Rose, Gideon, (1998), “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy”, World Politics, Vol. 51, No. 1, https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S0043887100007814.
- Schulze, Ilona, (2017), “A Typology of Ethnic Minorities in Armenia”, Iran and the Caucasus, Vol. 21, No. 4, https:// doi. org/ 10. 1163/1573384X-20170403.
- Schweller, Randall, (2004), “Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of UnderbalancingUnder Balancing”, International Security, Vol. 29, No. 2, https:// doi. org/ 10. 1162/ 0162288042879913.
- Terzyan, Aram, (2019), “Russian policyPolicy, Russian Armenians and Armenia: Ethnic Minority or Political Leverage?”, CES Working Papers, Vol. 11, No. 2.
- Tsulaia, Ia, (2011), “To Be Kist: Between Georgian and Chechen”, In Sophia Khutsishvili & John Horan (ed), Changing Identities: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Tbilisi: Heinrich Böll Stiftung South Caucasus, 126-147.
- Valiyev, Javid, (2017), “Foreign Policy of Azerbaijan in 25 Years of Independence: Priorities, Principles and Achievements”, Caucasus International, Vol. 7, No. 1.
- Zartman, William, (2000), “Ripeness: The Hurting Stalemate and Beyond”, In Daniel Druckman & Paul Stern (ed), International Conflict Resolution After the Cold War, Washington D.C: National Academies Press.
Websites
- “Armenia Trade Statistics”, (2021), (The World Bank) Retrieved December 18, 2024, from World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS): https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/ARM.
- Avetisyan, Ani, (2024, July 19), “Russia Rages Over US Military Exercise in Armenia”, Retrieved December 18, 2024, from EurasiaNet: https://eurasianet.org/russia-rages-over-us-military-exercise-in-armenia.
- “Azerbaijan Trade Statistics”, (2021), (The World Bank) Retrieved December 18, 2024, from World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS): https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/AZE.
- Bellamy, Daniel, (2024, June 12), “Armenia to Leave Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization”, Retrieved December 18, 2024, from Euronews: https:// www. euronews. com/2024/ 06/12/armenia-to-leave-russian-led-collective-security-treaty-organisation.
- Edwards, Maxim, (2017, August 2), “Armenia: Ethnic Minorities Gain a Voice in Parliament”, Retrieved December 18, 2024, from Eurasianet: https://eurasianet.org/armenia-ethnic-minorities-gain-a-voice-in-parliament.
- Fazl-e-Haider, Seyed, (2024, September 12), “India Becomes Armenia’s Largest Defense Supplier”, Retrieved December 18, 2024, from the Jamestown Foundation: https:// jamestown. org/ program/ india-becomes- armenias-largest-defense-supplier.
- “GDP (constant 2015 US$) - Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia”, (2024, April), Retrieved December 18, 2024, from the World Bank: https:// data. worldbank. org/ indicator/ NY. GDP. MKTP. KD? locations=AZ-AM-GE&start=2010.
- “Georgia Trade Statistics”, (2021), (The World Bank) Retrieved December 18, 2024, from World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS): https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/GEO.
- “Military Expenditure (% of GDP) - Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia”, (2024), Retrieved December 18, 2024, from the World Bank: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS?locations=AM-AZ-GE.
- “Military Expenditure (Current USD) - Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia”, (2024), Retrieved December 18, 2024, from The World Bank: https:// data. worldbank. org/ indicator/ MS. MIL. XPND.CD?locations=AM-AZ-GE.
)