نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
2 استاد گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
چکیده
امواج انقلابخواهانه بهار عربی، شعارهای سیاسی بیشماری را تولید کرده است و هدف این پژوهش بررسی شعارهای گردآوریشده از میادین اعتراض و تحصن در مصر، تونس، لیبی، یمن و سوریه است. پرسش اصلی پژوهش این است که «شعارهای خیزشهای مردمی در بهار عربی، چگونه و از طریق چه سازوکارهای گفتمانی، بهمثابه رسانهای برای انتقال انتقادات سیاسی عمل کردند و با اتخاذ چه راهبردهای گفتمانی، خود را بهعنوان زیرژانری متمایز در گفتمان سیاسی جهان عرب تثبیت کردهاند؟». این پژوهش از نوع کیفی بوده و با بهکارگیری روش تحلیل گفتمان سیاسی ون دایک، ساختارها و راهبردهای گفتمانی خاصی که در این شعارها برای شکلدهی به زیرژانری از گفتمان سیاسی در جهان عرب بهکار رفتهاند، کاوش میشود. دادهها از منابع متنوعی همچون بنرها، دیوارنویسیها، ابزارهای شنیداری- دیداری، سرودخوانی و سخنرانیها و همچنین شعرها و ترانهها استخراج شده است تا نشان دهد چه اندازه این شعارها بهمثابه رسانهای برای ابراز و مصرف انتقادات و نظرات سیاسی عمل میکنند. طبق یافتههای این پژوهش، موضوعات این شعارها، طرحوارههای فرامتنی، معناشناسی محلی و واژگان، صورتهای نحوی، عملیات بلاغی و ساختارهای بیانی و کنشهای گفتاریِ آنها، همگی گواه آنند که شعارهای بهار عربی بخشی بنیادین از گفتمان سیاسی محسوب میشوند.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Role of Language in Representing Political Discourse: A Case Study of Arab Spring Slogans (2011–2013)
نویسندگان [English]
- Parisa Rezaei Fedeshkoyeh 1
- Bahram Akhavan Kazemi 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction
The revolutionary movements of the Arab Spring, which began in 2010, did more than reshape political regimes; they marked a watershed in the evolution of political discourse across the Arab world. This period witnessed a linguistic and rhetorical explosion in the public sphere, most notably in the widespread use of street slogans. Relying on colloquial language, cultural metaphors, political humor, and music, these slogans became vehicles for expressing anger, articulating demands, and forging collective identity. In contexts where official media were tightly controlled by authoritarian regimes, slogans functioned as alternative tools for articulating protest, opinion, and public sentiment. They not only conveyed political messages but also generated meaning and redefined the discursive terrain of power.
The present research aimed to analyze the function of language in the production and representation of political discourse through Arab Spring slogans. It sought to answer the following research questions: How did the grassroots slogans of the Arab Spring function as media for conveying political criticism? Through which discursive mechanisms did they operate? And what discursive strategies enabled them to establish themselves as a distinctive subgenre within Arab political discourse? The study is based on hypothesis that the slogans of the Arab Spring employed key discursive strategies, including message simplification, moral polarization (we/they), appeals to a wounded collective identity, and emotional mobilization through rhythmic chants and symbolic imagery. These strategies supposedly functioned not only as effective alternative media for expressing radical political and social criticism, but also as means of reinterpreting and expanding the norms of political discourse. In doing so, they established themselves as a distinct, dynamic, and persuasive subgenre within contemporary Arab political discourse.
Literature Review
The literature examined the relationship between language and politics in the context of the Arab Spring. In this respect, studies such as Voices of the Arab Spring: Personal Stories From the Arab Revolutions (Al-Saleh, 2024) offered vivid first-hand accounts of participant experiences. Concerning political linguistics, several scholars have explored the ways slogans express ideology. Notable examples include: “The Rhetorical Functions of Slogans: Classifications and Characteristics” (Denton, 1980), Advertising Slogans of America (Sharp, 1984), and Crafting Equality: America’s Anglo-African Word (Condit & Lucaites, 1993). However, most of these studies focus on the symbolic or rhetorical dimensions of revolutions rather than on slogans themselves. Even in studies that address Arab Spring slogans, analysis has often emphasized thematic or ideological content rather than linguistic structure.
The current study differs in two main respects. First, it goes beyond the discourse of the Egyptian revolution to examine slogans used in Tunisia, Libya, Yemen, and Syria. Although these countries shared similar grievances, their slogans may reveal notable ideological and dialectal differences. Second, unlike previous research, this study does not merely classify thematic content; instead, it offers a detailed discourse–analytic examination of the strategies protesters used to persuade audiences of the legitimacy of their demands.
Materials and Methods
As a qualitative, descriptive–analytical inquiry, the present study employed van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis (CDA) framework to examine the structures, rhetorical strategies, and ideological dimensions of slogans collected from Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, Libya, and Syria. The data was collected from banners, graffiti, videos, speeches, chants, poems, and songs associated with the uprisings.
Results and Discussion
According to the results, Arab Spring slogans did more than simply convey direct criticism; they also redefined the parameters of political discourse. The findings support the hypothesis that their emergence as a distinct and effective subgenre of political discourse can be attributed to four key strategies: message simplification, absolute moral polarization (we/they), appeals to collective identity, and emotional mobilization. These strategies did not operate in isolation; rather, they interacted across three macro-level functions: delegitimizing the existing regime, legitimizing a revolutionary alternative, and mobilizing collective action through the construction of a shared identity.
Concerning the first level, message simplification was achieved through syntactic brevity, including verbless nominal clauses, imperatives, and elisions; moreover, moral polarization was produced through a binary lexical–pronominal system (i.e., an inclusive we versus an excluded they). They helped divide the social world into two opposing camps of good and evil. This mechanism articulated a critical and delegitimizing message about the common enemy in a way that was clear, forceful, and easily understood and transmitted to mass audiences.
At the second level, the antagonism was not merely destructive. Instead, by invoking a wounded collective identity, it redefined a we that demanded justice, dignity, and freedom. The use of vocative and exhortative verbal forms directly engaged audiences and helped construct a coherent, utopian revolutionary identity in opposition to the hegemonic discourses of the regimes. In this way, the slogans functioned to legitimize the alternative identity they sought to represent.
Finally, the most effective factor in consolidating this subgenre was emotional mobilization through rhetorical and expressive devices. Rhyme, parallelism, alliteration, repetition, and multimodality (i.e., the combination of text with image and music) transformed complex political messages into powerful, memorable, and transmissible semantic units in the form of slogans. As these slogans spread like semantic viruses, they functioned effectively as an alternative medium, evolving into striking, memorable, and replicable instruments that amplified shared affect and collective resolve. Through speech acts such as commands and imperatives, slogans ceased to be mere critiques and instead became agents that claimed sovereign prerogatives and worked to establish a new discursive order. In this way, slogans moved beyond criticism and turned became symbolic acts that created a space for the enactment of popular power.
Conclusion
Arab Spring slogans displayed distinct discursive patterns designed to generate meaning, persuade audiences, and mobilize society. They fall into four main categories: anti-regime slogans; identity-forming slogans invoking Islamic or pan-Arab solidarity; socioeconomic protest slogans addressing economic and livelihood concerns; and political humor slogans mocking leaders and challenging official legitimacy. As concise yet content-rich texts, these slogans compressed multiple semantic layers into compact forms.
Relying on a combination of these strategies, Arab Spring slogans expanded the boundaries of political discourse. By moving beyond formal, unidirectional modes of communication, they fostered a participatory, multimedia, and affect-driven discourse in which language itself became a political act—reclaiming the right to speak and redefining power relations. This discursive model constituted a meaning-making ecosystem in which every linguistic element—from a pronoun to a rhyme—would work in concert both to dismantle the symbolic world of authoritarian regimes and to construct a new symbolic order grounded in collective will. Thus, these slogans established themselves not merely as an alternative medium but as a distinct, dynamic, and persuasive subgenre within contemporary Arab political discourse, whose effectiveness was proved in practice.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Political Slogan
- Political Discourse Analysis
- Van Dijk
- Arab World
- Arab Spring
- الصالح، اسعد، (1403)، فریادهای بهار عربی: روایتهای شخصی از انقلابهای عربی. ترجمه محمدمهدی هاتف، مهدیه میرمحمد و جمعی از مترجمین، محل نشر: کرگدن.
- المجالی، رضوان، (2021)، «التجاهات العامة فی دراسة العالم العربی فی السیاسة الدولیة: الخطاب السیاسی العربی فی ظل الربیع العربی (2011-2019) دراسة حالة»، دراسات: العلوم الانسانیة والاجتماعیة، دوره 48، شماره 3.
- رجایی، فرهنگ، (1401)، اندیشه سیاسی در جهان عرب؛ از پاییز خلافت تا بهار عربی، محل نشر: مرکز مطالعات سیاسی و بین المللی وزارت امور خارجه.
- سراج، نادر، (2017)، الخطاب الاحتجاجی: دراسة تحلیلیة فی شعارات الحراک المدنی، محل نشر: المرکز العربی للأبحاث ودراسة السیاسات.
- سراج، نادر، (2014)، مصر الثورة وشعارات شبابها: دراسة لسانیة فی عفویة التعبیر، محل نشر: المرکز العربی للأبحاث ودراسة السیاسات.
- سردارنیا، خلیل و البرزی، هنگامه، (1401)، «تحلیل اعتراضات صنفی- اجتماعی اخیر در ایران از منظر نظریه سیاست خیابان»، پژوهشهای راهبردی سیاست، دوره 11، شماره40، 107-150.
- عیطة، مالک، (2017)، سیمیائیة الخطاب السیاسی العربی نظرة فی مشکلات التأویل فی الخطاب الثوری السوری، محل نشر: مرکز حرمون للدراسات المعاصرة.
References
- Abaza, M, (2013), “Satire, Laughter and Mourning in Cairo’s Graffiti”, Orient‑Institut Studies, Available at: http:// www. perspectivia. net/ content/ publikationen/ orientinstitut- studies/ 2–2013/ abaza_satire/, Accessed 8 June 2015.
- Abdul‑Raof, H, (2006), Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis, London: UK: Routledge.
- Al‑akhbar, (2011), “Shiʿarat al‑Thawrah al‑Yamaniyah: Ibarat Mujazah La Takhlū Min al‑Duʿabah”, Available at: http:// www.al-akhbar. com/ node/6050, Last Seen: 5 July 2025.
- Al‑Haq, F. A., & Hussein, A, (2012), “The Slogans of the Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions”, In: 42nd Colloquium on African Languages and Linguistics (CALL), Leiden, The Netherlands, 27–29 August 2012. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics.
- net, (2011), “Shiʿarat al‑Thawra bi‑Dababāt Jaysh Miṣr”, Available at: http:// www. aljazeera. net/ news/ reportsandinterviews/ 2011/2/5 Last Seen 5 July 2025.
- Americanrhetoric, (2025), “Figures: Antimetabole”, Available at: http:// americanrhetoric.com/figures/antimetabole.htm, Last Seen: 5 July 2025).
- Blogspot, (2011), Taʿrif al-Baltajah, Available at: http:// 3malamatan. blogspot.com/2008/06/blog-post_08.html, Last Seen: 5, 2025).
- Bolinger, D, (1980), Language – The Loaded Weapon: The Use and Abuse of Language Today, London, UK: Longman Group.
- Chilton, P. A & Schäffner, C, (1997), “Discourse and Politics”, In: van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, London, UK: SAGE, pp. 206–230.
- Chomsky, N & Herman, E, (1988), Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, New York, NY: Pantheon.
- Condit, C & Lucaites, J, (1993), Crafting Equality: America’s Anglo‑African Word, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Courtney, R, (1990), Drama and Intelligence: A Cognitive Theory, Montreal, QC: McGill‑Queen’s University Press.
- Crystal, D, (2003), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Denton, R, (1980), “The Rhetorical Functions of Slogans: Classifications and Characteristics”, Communication Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 2.
- Dubois, S, (2013), “Street Songs from the Syrian Protests”, Orient‑Institut Studies, 2(2013), Available at: http:// www. perspectivia. net/ content/ publikationen/orient-institutstudies/2–2013/dubois_songs, Last Seen: 8 June 2015.
- Elaphblog, (2011), Shafshufat al-Qadhafi, available at: http:// www.elaphblog.com/posts.aspx?u=844&A=78370 (Accessed July 5, 2025).
- Fairclough, N. L, (1995), Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow, UK: Longman.
- Facebook, (2013, July 12), “Zanqa Zanqa Dar Dar Badna Rasak Ya Bashar” [Video], Facebook, https://facebook.com/100069204998188, Last Seen: 5 July 2025).
- Facebook, (2023, February 11), “Zanqa Zanqa Dar Dar Ya Qadhafi Dart Al‑Ar”, Facebook, https:// facebook. com/ FebruaSS/ videos/ 570773604963077, Last Seen: 5 July 2025).
- Fawcett, P, (1997), Translation and Language: Linguistic Theories Explained, Manchester, UK: St Jerome Publishing.
- Gaddafi, M, (2012, July 29), “Khitaab Zanqa Zanqa”, https:// www. youtube. com/watch?v=SuIlyDUs4Qg, Last Seen: 5 July 2025.
- Gonzalez‑Quijano, Y, (2013), “Rap, an Art of the Revolution or a Revolution in Art?” Orient‑Institut Studies, 2(2013), Available at: http:// www. perspectivia. net/ content/ publikationen/ orient- institut- studies/2–2013/gonzalez-quijano_rap, Last Seen: 8 June 2015.
- Grabe, W & Kaplan, R. B, (1996), Theory and Practice of Writing: An Applied Linguistic Perspective, New York, NY: Longman.
- Gribbon, L & Hawns, S, (2012), “Signs and Signifiers: Visual Translations of Revolt”, In: Mehrez, S. (ed.) Translating Egypt’s Revolution: The Language of Tahrir, Cairo, Egypt & New York, NY: The American University in Cairo Press.
- Halliday, M. A. K, (1970), “Language Structure and Language Function”, In: Lyons, J, (ed.) New Horizons in Linguistics, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
- Halliday, M. A. K, (1994), An Introduction to Functional Grammar, London, UK: Edward Arnold.
- Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R, (1985), Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social‑Semiotic Perspective, Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
- Kaul, D. K, (2010), “Continuing Place Discourse – Place Identity and Slogans”, Available at: http:// panunkashmir. org/ blog/ ecoculture/ continuing- place- discourse- placeidentity- and- slogans, Last Seen: 5 August 2013).
- Keraitim, S & Mehrez, S, (2012), “Mulid al‑Tahrir: Semiotics of a Revolution”, In: Mehrez, S. (ed.) Translating Egypt’s Revolution: The Language of Tahrir, Cairo, Egypt & New York, NY: The American University in Cairo Press.
- Lahlali, M, (2014), “The Discourse of Egyptian Slogans: From ‘Long Live Sir’ to ‘Down with the Dictator”, Journal of Arab Media and Society, No. 19.
- Lu, X, (1999), “An Ideological/Cultural Analysis of Political Slogans in Communist China”, Discourse and Society, Vol. 10, No. 4.
- Lu, X, (2004), Rhetoric of the Chinese Cultural Revolution: The Impact on Chinese Thought, Culture, and Communication, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
- Maktoob Blog, (2011), Al-Shiʿarat wa al-Ḥanajir al-Dhahabiya wa Ahmiyatuha fi Tabrir wa Tajij wa Injah al-Thawra, Available at: http://halaabulail.maktoobblog.com/325, Last Seen: July 5, 2025.
- Muntadayat Jabal Habashi, (2011), Maʿan li-Ajl Alf Shiʿar min Shiʿarat al-Thawrah al-Yamaniyah, Available at: http://gaha.ba7r.org/t18174-topic, Last Seen: July 5, 2025.
- Muntadyat ibn al-Yaman, (2011), Shiʿarat al-Thawrah al-Yamaniyah, Available at: http:// www. ebnalyaman. com/ ip/ ipb/ index. php? showtopic= 20654, Last Seen: July 5, 2025.
- Neggaz, N, (2013), “Syria’s Arab Spring: Language Enrichment in the Midst of Revolution”, Language Discourse and Society, 11, Available at: http://www.language-andsociety.org/journal/2–2/1_neggaz_article.pdf Last Seen: 9 July 2015.
- Qashoush, I, (2011, March 17), “Yalla Irhal Ya Bashar [Time to Leave, Oh Bashar]”, YouTube, https:// www. youtube. com/ watch? v=x CS8SsFOBAI Last Seen: 5 July 2025.
- Sanders, L, IV (2012), “Reclaiming the City: Street Art of the Revolution”, In: Mehrez, S, (ed.) Translating Egypt’s Revolution: The Language of Tahrir. Cairo, Egypt & New York, NY: The American University in Cairo Press.
- Sanders, L. IV & Visona, M, (2012), “The Soul of Tahrir: Poetics of a Revolution”, In: Mehrez, S. (ed.) Translating Egypt’s Revolution: The Language of Tahrir, Cairo, Egypt & New York, NY: The American University in Cairo Press.
- Sharp, H, (1984), Advertising Slogans of America, Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press.
- Shorouknews, (2011), “Qamus al‑Thawrat al‑ʿArabiyah: Fi al‑Bada Kanat (Harimna) Thumma Intahat bi al‑Fulul”, Available at: http:// www. shorouknews. com/print.aspx?id=474884, Last Seen: 5 July 2025).
- Srage, N, (2013), “The Protest Discourse: The Example of ‘Irhal’ (Go/Get Out/Leave)”, Orient‑Institut Studies, 2(2013), Available at: http:// www. perspectivia. net/ content/ publikationen/ orient- institut- studies/ 2–2013/srage_protest, Last Seen: 8 June 2015.
- Sublat ʿUman, (2011), 16 Haqiqah Ghair Maʿrufah ʿan al-Qadhafi wa Libya, Available at: http://avb.s-oman.net/showthread.php?t=1372017 Last Seen: July 5, 2025.
- Swales, J, (1990), Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Taba, A., & Combs, C. (2012), “Of Drama and Performance: Transformative Discourse of the Revolution”, In: Mehrez, S. (ed.) Translating Egypt’s Revolution: The Language of Tahrir, Cairo, Egypt & New York, NY: The American University in Cairo Press.
- Urdang, L & Robbins, C, (eds) (1984), Slogans, Detroit, MI: Gale Research Company.
- van Dijk, T. A, (1995), “Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis”, In: Schäffner, C & Wenden, A, (eds) Language and Peace, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing, pp. 17–33, Available at: http:// www. discourse. org, Last Seen: 13 October 2011.
- Van Dijk, T. A, (1997), “What Is Political Discourse Analysis?”, In: Blommaert, J & Bulcaen, C. (eds) Political Linguistics, Vol. 11, No. 1, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
- van Dijk, T. A, (1998), Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, London: Sage.
- Van Dijk, T. A, (1999), “Critical Discourse Analysis and Conversation Analysis”, Discourse and Society, Vol. 10, No. 4.
- Van Dijk, T. A, (2006), “Politics, Ideology and Discourse”, Available at: http://www.discourse.org, Last Seen: 17 March 2011.
- Watson, J, (1999), “The Syntax of Headlines and News Summaries in Arabic”, In: Suleiman, Y. (ed.) Arabic Grammar and Linguistics, London, UK: London University Press.
- Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, (2011), “Singing Revolution: Libyan Protest Slogans”, Available at: http:// en. wikipedia. org/ wiki/ 2011_ Libyan_protests_chants (Accessed July 5, 2025).
- Wilson, J, (2003), “Political Discourse”, In: Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D & Hamilton, H. E, (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Blackwell Reference, Available at: http:// www. blackwellreference. com/ subscriber/ tocnode?id=g9780631205968_chunk_g978063120596821, Last Seen: 9 July 2015.
- YouTube, (2011, January 24), “Al‑Shaab Yureed Isqat Al‑Hukoomah”, http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8Xj8gAfjoI, Last Seen: 5 July 2025.
- YouTube, (2011, February 11), “Ajmal Hutafat Thawrat Khamsah wa Ishreen Yanayir Amam Masbiro”, http:// www. youtube. com/ watch? v=tsoE6oPWWwU, Last Seen: 5 July 2025.
- YouTube, (2011), “Shiʿarat Min Thawrat Al‑Shaab Al‑Yamaniyah Al‑Silmiyah”, http:// www. youtube. com/ watch? v=kX2aVqtOpjs, Last Seen: 5 July 2025.
- YouTube, (2011), “Ya Hamadah wa Ya Khaloud Quloo Li‑Babatkum Matroud – Thawrat Al‑Yaman”, http:// www. youtube. com/ watch?v=gaKiP0aKZ30, Last Seen: 5 July 2025.
- YouTube, (2011), “Al‑Thawra Al‑Yamaniyah: Jomʿat Al‑Rahil – Taʿiz”, http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=HU1EIm2zmkg, Last Seen: 5 July 2025.
- YouTube, (2011), “Allah Yumhil Wala Yuhmil Ya Ali Ya Afash”, https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOXkemTVgEA, Last Seen: 5 July 2025.
- YouTube, (2012), “January 25, 2011 Qasr El Nil 1:46 PM”, http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1ItZFFY_rc, Last Seen: 5 July 2025.
- World Bank, (2013), “Prospects: Middle East and North Africa”, Available at: http://go.worldbank.org/0EJQA0G0C0, Last Seen: 5 July 2025.
)