نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مطالعات منطقه ای گروه حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه جامعه شناسی دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.

چکیده

توسعه سیاسی به‌مثابه رشد، آگاهی، فرهنگ سیاسی و تمایل شهروندان به مردم‌سالاری، ارزش‌های دموکراتیک و مشارکت سیاسی مبتنی بر الگوهای اکتسابی و عقلانی است. با افزایش سرمایه اجتماعی، فرهنگی و اقتصادی؛ گرایش به ارزش‌های توسعه سیاسی نیز بیشتر می‌شود. بر اساس فراتحلیل ۵۶ مطالعه علمی در بازه زمانی ۱۳۸۴ تا ۱۴۰۳، رابطه سه نوع سرمایه اجتماعی، فرهنگی و اقتصادی با توسعه سیاسی در ایران مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. روش پژوهش کمی و از نوع فراتحلیل (با نرم‌افزار CMA2) بود و از آزمون‌های اندازه اثر کوهن و فیشر برای تحلیل داده‌ها استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که سرمایه اجتماعی با ضریب اثر ۰.۵۶۳ قوی‌ترین رابطه مثبت و معنی‌دار را با توسعه سیاسی دارد. در بین مؤلفه‌های آن، اعتماد اجتماعی (۰.۶۲۱) بیشترین تأثیر را نشان داد. سرمایه فرهنگی با ضریب اثر ۰.۴۷۲ رابطه مثبت و معنی‌داری داشت که در آن سواد رسانه‌ای (۰.۴۱۰) و تعلق مذهبی (۰.۳۳۵) نقش برجسته‌ای در فرایند توسعه سیاسی ایران عمل نموده است. در مقابل، سرمایه اقتصادی با ضریب اثر ۰.۲۸۰ ضعیف‌ترین، اما همچنان معنی‌دارترین ارتباط را با توسعه سیاسی نشان داده و مؤلفه مشارکت اقتصادی (۰.۳۱۶) بیشترین سهم را در این زمینه دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Iran’s Political Development Process in Light of Social, Cultural, and Economic Capital Index: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Published During 2005–2024

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ayoub Menati 1
  • Taha ashayeri 2

1 Assistant Professor of Regional Studies, Department of Law and Political Science, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Development is a long-term process that requires specific structures and conditions, which emerge gradually over the course of history. After the 1979 Revolution, Iranian society experienced various political changes. The growing participation in elections from 1978 to 2024 reflects a process of political maturation and development within the society. Research indicates that political developments, democratic changes, and citizens’ reliance on participation and elections during historical transformations are influenced by various factors—most notably the levels of economic, cultural, and social capital. These variables have played a significant and vital role in shaping the political development of Iranian society. In this respect, the present study aimed to examine Iran’s political development as manifested in research studies published during 2005–2024. It sought to address the following questions: (1) Is there a significant relationship between social capital and political development? (2) Is there a significant relationship between cultural capital and political development? And (3) is there a significant relationship between economic capital and political development? The study is based on the hypothesis that social, economic, and cultural capital simultaneously influence the realization of political development.
Literature Review
Political development can be defined as the process of adjustment between traditional patterns of life and new societal demands. One of its initial steps is the formation of a national state. Political development may manifest across the general population, at the state level, or in the organizational structure of the political system. Historically, the concept first referred to achieving individual goals through planning, but over time it came to signify movement from the status quo toward a more desirable situation. Gradually, the concept of political development became associated with political empowerment, political competence, political participation, and political culture. In broad terms, development is a process in which social transformation occurs; in which changes emerge in the social system, political organization, and leadership, and human capabilities expand along with political functions and capacities.
Materials and Methods
This study used meta-analysis to examine Iran’s political development as manifested in research studies. Meta-analysis estimates the overall effect size by synthesizing results from multiple studies as a single analytical unit. The current analysis focused on the published articles, the year of publication, and the key independent and dependent variables. Several keywords were used to retrieve the relevant articles from the databases such as Noormags, Civica, IranDoc, and Magiran. The timeframe was limited to the period 2005–2024. In total, 99 studies were initially identified. After screening them for methodological rigor, credibility, validity, and scientific relevance, 56 documents were selected for analysis. The analysis used CMA2 software and Cohen’s d and Fisher’s effect size tests to estimate the final effect size for each study, as well as the total final effect size.
Results and Discussion
According to the findings, social capital has the strongest positive and significant relationship with political development, with an effect coefficient of 0.563. Among its components, social trust (0.621) showed the greatest impact. Cultural capital also demonstrates a positive and significant relationship with political development, with an effect coefficient of 0.472; within this dimension, media literacy (0.410) and religious affiliation (0.335) have played prominent roles in the process of political development in Iran. In contrast, economic capital has the weakest—though still significant—relationship with political development, with an effect coefficient of 0.280. Concerning economic capital, the component of economic participation (0.316) contributed the most. Overall, the results suggest that political development in Iran is influenced more by social and cultural capital than by economic factors. Moreover, strengthening trust, social cohesion, and civic awareness can provide an appropriate foundation for the realization of political development.
Conclusion
Relying on a meta-analysis of 56 research studies published during 2005–2024, the current analysis examined the relationship between three forms of capital—social, cultural, and economic—and political development in Iran. Political development refers to the enhancement of civic capacity, political activism, political awareness, and the realization of citizenship rights within a democratic framework, including attention to minority rights alongside the majority rule. In the research model, this variable demonstrated an effect coefficient of r = 0.563, indicating a substantial ability to explain and predict the level of political development. Given the identified rational patterns, political development is defined as the growth of political awareness, political culture, citizens’ inclination toward democracy, democratic values, and political participation. As levels of social, cultural, and economic capital increase, the tendency towards values associated with political development also rises.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social Capital
  • Cultural Capital
  • Economic Capital
  • Political Development
  • Equality
  • Social Justice
  • منابع

    References

    • Almond, G & Verba, S, (1963), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes in Five Nations and Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • Apter, D, (1965), The Politics of Modernization, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Ayub, A. K., Karim, K & Akhtar, S, (2020), “Political Development and Pakistan Studies at 10th Grade: An Analytical Study”, Global Social Sciences Review, Vol. 5, No. 3, https:// doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020 (V-III).30.
    • Bourdieu, P, (1986), “The Forms of Capital”, In Richardson, J. G. (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258), New York: Greenwood Press.
    • Christensen, M, (2017), “A Critical Sociology of International Expertise: The Case of International Democracy Assistance”, In Kurasawa, F, (Ed.), Interrogating the Social: A Critical Sociology for the 21st Century (pp. 191–215), Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Enríquez Arévalo, E, (2023), Towards a Theory of Dependent Democracy, Thesis Eleven, Advance Online Publication, https:// doi. org/10.1177/07255136231202057.
    • Fukuyama, F, (2001), “Social Capital, Civil Society and Development”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 22, Nol. 1, https:// doi. org/ 10.1080/ 713701144.
    • Giorgas, D, (2007), “The Significance of Social Capital for Rural and Regional Communities”, Rural Society, Vol. 17, No. 3.
    • Hassan, K. M., Sanchez, B & Yu, J. K, (2011), “Financial Development and Economic Growth: New Evidence from Panel Data”, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 51, No. 1.
    • Henn, M., Weinstein, M & Forrest, S, (2005), “Uninterested Youth? Young People’s Attitudes towards Party Politics in Britain”, Political Studies, Vol. 53, No. l 3.
    • Kothari, R, (1988), State against Democracy: In Search of Humane Governance, New Delhi: Ajanta Publishers.
    • Kraaykamp, G & Van Eijck, K, (2010), “The Intergenerational Reproduction of Cultural Capital: A Threefold Perspective”, Social Forces, Vol. 89, Nol. 1, https:// doi. org/ 10.1353/ sof.2010.0087.
    • Labonté, R, (2018), “Social Capital and Community Development: Practitioner Empirical Perspectives”, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X. 1999.tb01289.x.
    • Lareau, A, (2015), “Cultural Knowledge and Social Inequality”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 80, Nol. 1, https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/0003122414565814.
    • Mahdavi, P, (2019), “The Relationship between Political and Economic Development in Selected Countries”, Available at SSRN: https:// ssrn. com/ abstract= 4069338 or http://dx. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4069338.
    • Markussen, T, (2017), “Social and Political Capital, Growth, Structural Transformation, and Rural Change in Vietnam: A Rising Dragon on the Move”, In S. G. B. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of Contemporary Vietnam(pp. 181–202). Routledge, https:// doi.org/10.1093/ acprof: oso/ 9780198796961. 003.0009. Pages 181–202.
    • Midgley, J & Conley, A, (2010), “Introduction”, In Midgley, J & Conley, A. (Eds.), Social Work and Social Development: Theories and Skills for Developmental Social Work (pp. xiii-xx), New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Milligan, K. E., Moretti, E & Oreopoulos, P, (2004), “Does Education Improve Citizenship? Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 88, No. 9–10, https:// doi. org/ 10.1016/ j.jpubeco. 2003.10.005.
    • Newton, K, (1999), “Social Capital and Democracy in Modern Europe”, In van Deth, J et al., (Eds.), Social Capital and European Democracy, London: Routledge.
    • Norris, P, (2002), Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    • Oesterdiekhoff, G, (2015), “Evolution of Democracy: Psychological Stages and Political Developments in World History”, Cultura: International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, Vol. 12, No. 2, https:// doi. org/ 10.5840/ cultura201512223.
    • Pennock, J. R, (2011), “Political Development, Political Systems, and Political Goods”, World Politics, 18, No. 3, https:// doi. org/ 10.2307/2009696.
    • Bláha, P, (2024), “Populism and Social Capital in Structurally Disadvantaged Regions and the 2023 Czech Presidential Election: Making Democracy Work Again?”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Vol. 32, No. 4, https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 14782804. 2023.2293778.
    • Prasand Adhikari, K & Goldey, P, (2009), “Social Capital and Its Downside: The Impact on Sustainability of Induced Community-Based Organizations in Nepal”, World Development, Vol. 38, No. 1.
    • Putnam, R. D, (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • Putnam, R. D, (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster.
    • Pye, L. W, (1965), “The Concept of Political Development”, Political Studies, Vol. 358, No. 1. https:// doi. org/10.1177/ 0002716265358001.
    • Sullivan, A, (2002), “Bourdieu and Education: How Useful is Bourdieu’s Theory for Researchers?”, The Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 2.
    • Taylor, A. J, (1989), “Historical Background and Political Development”, In Trade Unions and Politics, London: Palgrave, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20135-8_1.
    • Wahyuni, H, (2018), “The Effect of Social Capital on Welfare in Indonesia”, Journal of Indonesian Economy & Business, Vol. 33, No. 1.
    • Wang, Q, (2023), “Strengthening Democracy and Market Economies Through Social Capital Building in Developing Countries”, SHS Web of Conferences, 183, 02021 (2024). https:// doi.org/ 10.1051/ shsconf/ 202418302021.