نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین‌الملل، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

2 دانشیار روابط بین‌الملل، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

پیشرفت‌ها در زمینه هوش مصنوعی عده‌ای را به این باور رسانده است که در آینده‌ای نه‌چندان دور نه‌تنها تصمیمات سیاسی بلکه تصدی مناصب سیاسی هم به هوش مصنوعی واگذار شود. به همین دلیل این پژوهش درصدد است با اتکا به روش ترکیبی یا آمیخته، به این پرسش پاسخ دهد: هوش مصنوعی در تصمیم‌گیری سیاست خارجی چه کاربردی دارد و ظرفیت‌ها و چالش‌های کاربرد آن چیست؟ فرضیه‌ پژوهش این است که در وضعیت فعلی، هوش مصنوعی قادر به تصمیم‌گیری مستقل در سیاست خارجی نیست و در عوض در سیاست خارجی در قالب سیستم‌های پشتیبان و مکمل یا مشاور تصمیم‌گیری کاربرد دارد. به‌ بیان‌ دیگر یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهند که علی‌رغم اینکه سیستم‌های هوش مصنوعی در ارائه پشتیبانی تصمیم‌گیری به سیاست‌گذاران امیدوارکننده بوده‌اند، اما هنوز قادر به جایگزینی قضاوت و شهود انسانی در تصمیم‌گیری سیاست خارجی نیستند. در نتیجه بهتر است که هوش مصنوعی را به‌عنوان یک ابزار مکمل به‌جای یک تصمیم‌گیرنده مستقل در نظر بگیریم. همچنین اگرچه در بسیاری از موارد، تصمیم‌گیرندگان انسانی به کمک هوش مصنوعی می‌توانند تصمیمات بهتر و قابل‌ اعتمادتری بگیرند اما چالش‌های آن نیز مواردی چون عدم دسترسی به داده‌های با کیفیت و سوگیری‌های الگوریتمی، آسیب‌پذیری در برابر اطلاعات جعلی دشمن، ملاحظات اخلاقی و غیره است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Policy Decision-Making: Capacities and Challenges

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeed Mirahmadi 1
  • Ali Omidi 2

1 Ph.D Student, International Relations, Department of Political Sciences, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, International Relations, Department of Political Sciences, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction                                  
AI refers to systems that exhibit intelligent behavior by analyzing their environment and taking actions, with some degree of autonomy, to achieve specific goals. In recent years, AI has also made its way into politics. In an increasingly interconnected world, the emergence and rapid development of AI has become a pressing issue in foreign policy decision-making. The exponential growth of data and the emergence of advanced AI technologies have opened new opportunities to enhance human decision-making capabilities. The integration of AI technologies into foreign policy decision-making processes has the potential to transform the way countries shape their strategies and navigate complex geopolitical challenges. The present study aimed to examine the role of AI in foreign policy decision-making, as well as the capacities and challenges lie therein.
Literature Review
Several studies have dealt with to the use of AI in foreign policy decision-making. For instance, Berkoff (1997) explored the potential of AI to enhance individual and organizational decision-making capabilities, offering suggestions to the AI engineering community on what policymakers need to improve these processes. Putri et al. (2020) used AI to simulate ASEAN negotiations. They clarified how AI decision-making systems can help international relations experts and learners understand the decision-making process and government foreign policy strategies during diplomatic negotiations. Scott et al. (2018) tried to provide a basis for planning a foreign policy strategy that effectively responds to the emerging power of AI in international affairs. In the Iranian context, there is a notable lack of research regarding AI and its impact or application in foreign policy or international relations.
Materials and Methods
The study employed a mixed methods research design to analyze over 100 sources. Lawshe’s content validity ratio (CVR) method was used to validate the research hypothesis. Moreover, a panel of 12 experts, including academics and AI specialists, evaluated the hypothesis. With a CVR value exceeding 0.56, the hypothesis was confirmed, which showed the reliability of the research findings.
Results and Discussion
The applications of AI in foreign policy decision-making can be classified under two main types: 1) AI independent decision-making as in the virtual politician or AI politician and 2) AI as a support and supplement to decision-making in foreign policy. Currently, the concept of the AI politician is still at the theoretical level and has not been implemented in practice. Despite the efforts to promote the AI politician, these systems face many challenges and limitations. AI cannot understand complex foreign policy dynamics, cultural nuances, historical context, and diplomatic subtleties. Additionally, AI cannot evaluate and measure moral considerations or take responsibility for decisions. It is also unable to explain unexpected events, sudden policy changes, or emerging trends in world affairs. As a result, until these challenges are resolved, it is unlikely that humans will allow AI systems to make independent decisions.
AI tools and methods (e.g., neural networks, expert systems, fuzzy logic, evolutionary computing, natural language processing algorithms, and computational argumentation technology) can be used to support and supplement decision-making in foreign policy. Artificial neural networks can be used to predict conflicts and armed confrontations. A concrete example can be found in Olaide and Ojo (2021) which developed a model to predict conflicts in Nigeria. Expert systems can aid in diplomatic negotiations by creating scenarios. An example is the simulation of foreign policy decision-making in ASEAN negotiations. Fuzzy logic can also be helpful as seen in Sanjian’s attempt to use the fuzzy set theory for modeling the decision-making process in the U.S. arms transfers (Sanjian, 1988). Genetic algorithms are the most widely used evolutionary computing methods in decision-making, which can shorten decision-making time and provide better decision-making plans for foreign policy decision-makers. In addition, natural language processing algorithms can reduce language barriers between countries, allowing diplomats and policymakers to communicate more easily with foreign governments and embassies. Moreover, special systems like the Project Debater can debate complex issues with humans, helping people make persuasive arguments and informed decisions.
Using AI in foreign policy decision-making presents both capacities and challenges. AI offers several capacities to support decision-making in foreign policy. By helping decision-makers analyze abundant and diverse foreign policy data, AI enhances the ability to better assess decision risks and reduce errors in decision-making. This leads to more accurate predictions of international events and speeds up the decision-making process. Moreover, AI can reduce the influence of human biases, emotions, and interests, ultimately improving the quality of foreign policy decisions and enhancing the overall diplomacy process. Regarding the challenges, it is important to note that if the data inputted to AI is biased or incomplete, it can replicate and perpetuate human prejudices such as racism and sexism. The improper or unethical use of AI also poses a significant challenge. Additionally, AI systems lack the capacity for innovation and creativity and do not understand the value of human life or the consequences of military operations. Another challenge is verifying the performance of AI systems. The black box problem also presents a challenge, as the decisions made by AI cannot be easily explained by humans. Overall, considering both the capacities and challenges, researchers recommend that AI should support human strategic decision-making, with final decisions always being made by people in positions of authority.
Conclusion
The present study examined various applications of AI in foreign policy decision-making. The discussion concluded that the concept of the AI politician is not yet practical since AI lacks the capability to fully comprehend and navigate the complexities of foreign policy, thus making the emergence of such a phenomenon unlikely. In other words, AI cannot replace humans in making independent decisions within the realm of foreign policy. However, AI is effectively used today as a support and supplementary tool, serving roles in analysis and prediction to aid decision-making in foreign policy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Decision-making
  • Foreign Policy
  • Virtual Politician
  • AI Advisor
Acharya, GP, (2019, July 21), “The Impact of AI in International Relations”, https://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/perspective/news/the-impact-ai-international-relations-1774360.
- Ahmad, A. F., et al., (2023), “Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Loss in Decision Making, Laziness and Safety in Education”, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Vol. 10, No. 1.1-14.
- Allison, G.T, (1971), Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
- Al Kafarneh, A.A, (2013), “Decision-Making in Foreign Policy”, Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, Vol. 10, No. 1. 56-72.
- Anthony, M. & Bartlett, P.L, (1999), Neural Network Learning: Theoretical Foundations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Berkoff, R, (1997), Artificial Intelligence and Foreign Policy Decision Making [Master's Dissertation, Naval Postgraduate School], https://ia800305.us.archive.org/35/items/artificialintell00berk/artificialintell00berk.pdf.
- Bertossi, L., Geerts, F, (2020), “Data Quality and Explainable AI”, Journal of Data and Information Quality,Vol. 12, No. 2.1-9.
- Buckley, C, (2023), “The Consequences of Relying Too Much on AI”, https://www.buckleyplanet.com/2023/02/the-consequences-of-relying-too-much-onai.
- Chan, S., (2017), “Stanislav Petrov, Soviet officer Who Helped Avert Nuclear War, https:// www. nytimes. com/ 2017/09/18/ world/ europe/stanislav-petrov-nuclear-war-dead.html.
- Chen, L., Wang, Y., Guo, G, (2019), “An Improved Genetic Algorithm for Emergency Decision Making Under Resource Constraints Based on Prospect Theory”, Algorithms, Vol. 12, No. 2.1-11.
- Choi, E. C, (2019), “Will Algorithms Make Safe Decisions in Foreign Affairs”, https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/will-algorithms-make-safe-decisions-foreign-affairs/.
- Cioffi-Revilla, C, (2013), “Fuzzy Sets and Models of International Relations”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 25, No. 1. 129-159.
- Creighton, J, (2019), “How Can AI Systems Understand Human Values”, https://futureoflife.org/ai/how-can-ai-systems-understand-human-values/.
- Cummings, M.L., et al., (2018), Artificial Intelligence and International Affairs Disruption Anticipated, London: Chatham House.
- Davies, A, (2021), “Yandex’s Alice Takes Top Spot in Russia Voice Assistant Market”, https://rethinkresearch.biz/articles/yandexs-alice-takes-top-spot-in-russia-voice-assistant-market/.
- Duan, Y., Edward, J.S., Dwivedi, Y.K, (2019), “Artificial Intelligence for Decision Making in the Era of Big Data – Evolution, Challenges and Research Agenda”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 48, 63-71.
- Galeotti, M, (2023), “How AI Could Change Diplomacy Forever”, https://thespectator.com/topic/ai-artificial-intelligence-change-diplomacy-forever/.
- Gilbert, G. & Prion, S, (2016), “Making Sense of Methods and Measurement: Lawshe’s Content Validity Index”, Clinical Simulation in Nursing,Vol 12. 530-531, https:// www. researchgate. net/ profile/ Gregory- Gilbert-2Content-Validity-Index.pdf.
- Goldfarb, A. & Lindsay, J. R, (2022), “Prediction and Judgment: Why Artificial Intelligence Increases the Importance of Humans in War”, International Security, Vol 46, No 3. 7–50.
- Hand, D. & Khan, S, (2020), “Validating and Verifying AI Systems”, Patterns, Vol 1, No 3. 1-4.
- Houser, K, (2021), “IBM’s AI Debater Could Help You Make Better Decisions”, https://www.freethink.com/hard-tech/ai-debater.
- Hudson, V.M. & Vore, C.S, (1995), “Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow”, Mershon International Studies Review. Vol. 39, No 2.209-238.
- IBM Research, (2023), “Project Debater”, https://b2n.ir/j62630 .
- Jibril, M.L., et al., (2018), “On the Problems of Knowledge Acquisition and Representation of Expert System for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease”, International Journal of u- and e- Service, Science and Technology, Vol. 11, No. 3.49-58.
- Kane, A. & Wallach, W, (2022), “Artificial Intelligence Is Already Upending Geopolitics”, https:// techcrunch. com/ 2022/04/06/ artificial-intelligence- is-already-upending-geopolitics/.
- Kahneman, D, (2013), Thinking, Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Lawshe, C. H, (1975), “A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity”, Personnel Psychology, Vol 28. 563–575. https:// scholar. google. com/ scholar_ lookup?
- Lissovolik, Yaroslav, (2020), “AI in International Relations: The Era of ‘Digital Diplomacy”, https:// valdaiclub. com/ a/ highlights/ ai-in-international-relations/.
- Madhugiri, D, (2023), “Advantages and Disadvantages of Artificial Intelligence (AI)”, https:// www. knowledgehut. com/ blog/ data-science/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-artificial-intelligence.
- McKendrick, J. & Thurai, A, (2022), “AI Isn't Ready to Make Unsupervised Decisions”, https:// hbr. org/ 2022/09/ ai- isnt- ready- to- make-unsupervised-decisions.
- Moskvitch, K, (2019), “Augmenting Humans: IBM’s Project Debater AI Helps Human Debaters Win”, https://b2n.ir/y37901.
- Nature, (2021), “Am I Arguing With a Machine? AI Debaters Highlight Need for Transparency”, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00867-6.
- Olaide, O.B. & Ojo. A.K, (2021), “A Model for Conflicts’ Prediction Using Deep Neural Network”, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 183, No. 29.7-12.
- Petkova, G, (2021), “The Gold Standard – The Key to Information Extraction and Fata Quality Control”, https://www.ontotext.com/blog/gold-standard-key-to-information-extration-data-quality-control/.
- Phillips-Wren, G, (2012), “AI Tools in Decision Making Support Aystem: A Review”, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, Vol. 21, No. 2.1-13
- Putri, R. A. A. K., et al., (2020), Designing Artificial Intelligence/International Relations (AI/IR) Platform: Foreign Policy Decision-Making Simulation in ASEAN Negotiation, International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), Bandung, Indonesia.
- Rabi, S, (2023), “At the Nexus of AI and Diplomacy”, https://www.polemics-magazine.com/featured/at-the-nexus-of-ai-and-diplomacy.
- Rouhiainen, L, (2023), “Unethical Use of Artificial Intelligence”, https://b2n.ir/f12595.
- Russia Today, (2017), “Ageless, Objective & Logical: Russian AI Chatbot’s Presidential Bid Gets 20,000+ Supporters”, https:// www. rt. com/ news/412227-alice-bot-yandex-presidential-bid/.
- Ryan, M, (2020), “In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability”, Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 26, No. 4.1-19.
- Sanjian, G. S, (1988), “Fuzzy Set Theory and U.S. Arms Transfers: Modeling the Decision-Making Process”, American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 32, No. 4.1018–1046.
- Sanjian, G. S, (1991), “Great Power Arms Transfers: Modeling the Decision-Making Processes of Hegemonic, Industrial and Restrictive Exporters”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 35.173–193.
- Sanjian, G. S, (1992), “A Fuzzy Set Model of NATO Decision-Making: The Case of Short-Range Nuclear Forces in Europe”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 29, No. 3.271–286.
- Sarmah, H, (2019), “World’s First AI-Powered Virtual Politician SAM Joins the Electoral Race in New Zealand”, https:// analyticsindiamag. com/ worlds-first-ai-powered-virtual-politician-sam-joins-the-electoral-race-in-new-zealand/.
- Saxena, P, (2021), “AI Across Borders: AI in Diplomacy, International Relations, and Humanitarian Efforts”, https://indiaai.gov.in/article/ai-across-borders-ai-in-diplomacy-international-relations-and-humanitarian-efforts.
- Scot, B., Heumann, S. & Lorenz, P, (2018), “Artificial Intelligence and Foreign Policy”, https:// papers. ssrn. com/ sol3/ papers. cfm? abstract_ id=3103961.
- Simon, H. A, (1977), The New Science of Management Decision, Hoboken, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- Slonim, N., et al., (2021), “An Autonomous Debating System”, Nature. Vol. 591, No. 7850.379-384.
- Stanzel, V. & Voelsen, D, (2022), Diplomacy and Artificial Intelligence: Reflections on Practical Assistance for Diplomatic Negotiations. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP).
- The Hindu, (2017), “World’s First AI Politician Developed”, https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/worlds-first-ai-politician-developed/article20945483.ece.
- The Moscow Times, (2017), “Artificial Intelligence Robot 'Alisa' Nominated for Russian president”, https://B2n.ir/f71316.
- Ulnicane, I., et al., (2022), “Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Emerging International Trends and Policy Frames.In Maurizio Tinnirello (Eds.)”, The Global Politics of Artificial Intelligence, Boca Raton (Florida): CRC Press, Tylor & Francis Group.
- Vacarelu, M, (2021), Artificial Intelligence: to Strengthen or to Replace Traditional Diplomacy, Berlin: Springer.
- Wordliczek, L, (2023), “Neural Networks and Political Science: Testing the Methodological Frontiers”, Empiria Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales.No 57.37-62.
- Yandex, (2017), “Say “Privet” to Alice, Yandex’s Intelligent Assistant”, https://yandex.com/company/blog/say-privet-to-alice-yandex-s-intelligent-assistant/.
- Yu, L. & Li. Y, (2022), “Artificial Intelligence Decision-Making Transparency and Employees Trust: The Parallel Multiple Mediating Effect of Effectiveness and Discomfort”, Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 5.1-17
- Zednik, C, (2021), “Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence”, Philosophy & Technology, Vol. 34, No. 3.1-29.