نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
3 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
منابع آب مشترک در جهتدهی به مناسبات هیدروپلیتیک کشورها نقش تعیینکنندهای دارند. سرچشمه رودخانههای هیرمند و هریررود در افغانستان است که به واسطه شیب زمین به سمت ایران سرازیر میشوند. از اینرو افغانستان در مناسبات هیدروپلیتیک با ایران، موقعیت بالادستی دارد. این پژوهش بر آن است که رویکرد کارگزاران افغان بهعنوان متغیر موثر در مناسبات هیدروپلیتیک این کشور با ایران را طی زمان بررسی کند. دروندادهای مورد نیاز پژوهش با روش کتابخانهای و میدانی گردآوری شده است. یافتههای پژوهش نشان داد روند مناسبات هیدروپلیتیک دو کشور، همکاری در سطوح تبادلات و حمایتهای کلامی و بیان سیاستهای شفاهی؛ درگیری و کشمکش در سطوح گزارههای کلامی که نشان دهنده ناهماهنگی در تعامل و وجود تنش در کلام با طرف ایرانی است. متغیرهای نیاز افغانستان به منابع آب برای توسعه، سیاسی کردن آب توسط طرف ایرانی، خشکسالیهای پیاپی و حیثیتیسازی آب برای مردم افغانستان عوامل کلیدی موثر بر مناسبات هیدروپلیتیک افغانستان با ایران از دیدگاه کارگزاران و خبرگان افغان شناسایی شد. نتایج پژوهش بیانگر آن است که همکاریهای سازماندهی شده اقتصادی بین دو کشور میتواند به ایجاد منافع پایدار و بهبود مناسبات هیدروپلیتیک دو کشور منجر شود.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Approach of Afghan Actors to Hydropolitical Relations With Iran: A Trend Analysis and Foresight Study
نویسندگان [English]
- Zakeyeh Aftabi 1
- Morad Kaviani Rad 2
- Shirkhan Anwari 3
1 Ph.D Student, Political Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Political Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Ph.D Student, Political Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction
Water is fundamental to human development, as every society and political entity strives to improve both the quantity and quality of its water resources. Research shows that a sustainable and thriving human society cannot exist without reliable access to water. As a result, securing sustainable water resources has long been a strategic priority, shaping the decisions and actions of policymakers and leaders. Afghanistan, a predominantly mountainous country, is the source of several major rivers in South Asia that flow into neighboring countries. Among these, the Hirmand and Harirud rivers originate in Afghanistan and are vital to water security in eastern Iran. In recent decades, the construction of numerous dams on these rivers within Afghan territory has significantly reduced and disrupted the water flow into Iran. In response, Iranian negotiators have repeatedly sought to engage with Afghan counterparts to ensure water delivery, invoking the 1973 Hirmand Treaty and offering various incentives. Despite these efforts, negotiations have achieved limited success and encountered many challenges. Multiple factors influence the hydropolitical relationship between Iran and Afghanistan. The present study aimed to examine the role of Afghan actors as a key variable shaping the evolution of hydropolitical relations between the two countries.
Literature Review
There has been no serious research specifically addressing the role of Afghan actors in hydropolitical relations with Iran. The review identified existing research related to the hydropolitical dynamics between the two countries, which is closely connected to the topic of the current study. In the article “The Geopolitical Overlay of the Hydropolitics of the Harirud River Basin,” Nagheeby and Warner (2018) argue that Afghanistan’s control and management of water is not solely aimed at economic development. Instead, it serves broader strategic interests and reflects the concerns of both internal and external parties, particularly countries like the United States and India. From the Afghan perspective, dam construction is viewed not only as a symbol of nation-building but also as a means to assert national authority and power. In a later study titled “The 150-Year Itch: Afghanistan–Iran Hydropolitics Over the Helmand/Hirmand River,” Nagheeby and Warner (2022) examine the evolution of Afghanistan’s hydropolitical relations with Iran. They note that during the period of Western intervention and civil war, the water dispute between the two countries was often overshadowed by other pressing priorities, such as security, economic issues, and reconstruction. Their research emphasizes the importance of stability in Afghanistan. Moreover, in “Identifying the Effective Factors and the Importance of the Harirud Watershed in Afghanistan and Its Impact on Iran,” Yar et al. (2023) identified key factors influencing the Harirud watershed’s significance in Afghanistan and its implications for Iran. By analyzing 68 indicators, they concluded that the Harirud River plays a strategic role in national security, water resource management, and the implementation of Afghanistan’s economic development programs.
Materials and Methods
As an applied inquiry, the present research adopted a descriptive–survey approach. The data was collected and analyzed through both library research and field survey methods. The statistical population consisted of Afghan activists working in the field of water resources. The data collection methods included surveys, interviews, and questionnaires. Moreover, MICMAC (Matrix of Cross-Impact Multiplications Applied to a Classification) software was employed to analyze the data and identify key variables.
Results and Discussion
Three distinct phases can be identified in the hydropolitical relations between Afghan actors and Iran. During the Shahi period, Afghan actors viewed Iran’s control over the Hirmand and Harirud rivers as legitimate. It was during this time that the 1973 Hirmand Treat between Iran and Afghanistan was finalized. In the Republic period, Afghan actors rejected Iran's water rights in the Hirmand and Harirud river basins, considering them internal rivers belonging solely to Afghanistan. Advocates of this stance argued that Iran should defer to Afghanistan’s needs when it came to water allocation. Under the Islamic Emirate, the Taliban acknowledged Iran’s claims and expressed a willingness to negotiate over the Hirmand and Harirud rivers. However, despite several years of Taliban rule, Iran has yet to secure any formal water rights. Experts have identified several key variables influencing hydropolitical relations between the two countries, including Afghanistan’s growing need for water resources for development, Iran’s politicization of water issues (as in the A20 case), recurring droughts, and the broader importance of water for the Afghan population. The hydropolitical relations between Iran and Afghanistan serve as a clear example of transboundary water conflict and cooperation between neighboring countries. As the downstream country, Iran seeks collaboration to secure access to drinking water, support agriculture, and protect the environment in its eastern provinces. In contrast, Afghanistan, as the upstream country, has shown reluctance to engage in negotiations concerning Iran’s water needs. Consequently, the intense competition between Iran and Afghanistan is accompanied by political disputes over the allocation and utilization of the Hirmand and Harirud rivers, underscoring the significance of water as a political concern for both nations. This dynamic has led to intense competition and political disputes over the allocation and use of the Hirmand and Harirud rivers, underscoring the significance of water as a political concern for both nations. Given the strategic importance of these rivers and Afghanistan’s upstream position, the role of Afghan actors in shaping hydropolitical relations with Iran has emerged as a key factor. The trend analysis of Afghan actors’ perspectives revealed that the hydropolitical relationship between the two countries ranges from cooperation to conflict. Evidence of cooperation includes diplomatic exchanges, expressions of verbal support, and the oral communication of policies. On the other hand, conflict manifests in statements that reflect a lack of coordination and even verbal hostility directed at Iran. These findings are consistent with observations by Nagheeby and Warner (2022), who note that international media often portray water relations between Afghanistan and Iran as deteriorating and indicative of an emerging conflict. This alarming rhetoric are driven by factors including regional water scarcity, political instability in Afghanistan, Iran’s dependence on shared water resources, and the lack of effective bilateral cooperation. Despite these tensions, historical evidence suggests that water disputes between Iran and Afghanistan are unlikely to escalate into open warfare.
Conclusion
From the perspective of Afghan actors, several key factors shape the hydropolitical relationship between Iran and Afghanistan. These include Afghanistan’s pressing need for water resources to support development, Iran’s politicization of water issues, recurring droughts, and the cultural significance of water for the Afghan population.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank kharazmi university for providing the conditions for conducting this research.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Hydropolitical Relations
- Afghan Actors
- Shared Water Resources
- Hirmand and Harirud Rivers
- آفتابی، زکیه؛ کاویانیراد، مراد و کاردان مقدم، حمید، (1402)، «تبیین سناریوهای فراروی هیدروپلیتیک رودخانههای مرزی ایران و عراق»، مدیریت آب و آبیاری، دوره 13، شماره 2، 748-507. 22059/JWIM.2023.351144.1032.
- کاویانیراد، مراد؛ تکروستا، مریم و آفتابی، زکیه، (1402)، «تبیین سناریوهای فراروی مناسبات هیدروپلیتیک ایران و افغانستان در منابع آب مشترک با تاکید بر رودخانه هیرمند»، سیاستگذاری عمومی، دوره 9، شماره 4، 47-62. 22059/JPPOLICY.2024.96180.
- کاویانیراد، مراد، (1384)، «مناسبات هیدروپلیتیک ایران و عراق»، فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی، دوره 8، شماره 28، 337- 358. 1001.1.17350727.1384.8.28.5.9.
- کاویانیراد، مراد، (1398)، هیدروپلیتیک سویهها و رویکردها، چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
- میان آبادی، حجت و قریشی، زهرا، (1401)، «شناخت درهمتنیدگی مسائل هیدروپلیتیکی حوضه آبریز هیرمند»، پژوهشهای مهندسی آب ایران، دوره 2، شماره 3، 53-77. 22034/IJWER.2023.409040.1040.
References
- Aggestam, K; & Sundell-Eklund, A, (2014), “Situating Water in Peacebuilding: Revisiting the MiddleEast Peace Process”, Water International, Vol. 31, No. 1, 10-22. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02508060. 2013.848313.
- Alam, A, (1992), Yad’dashtha-ye Alam: Virayesh va Muqaddamah az Alinaqi Alikhani Bethesda, ML: Ibex Publishers.
- Asif, Z; Chen, Z; Sadiq, R.; & Zhu, Y, (2023), “Climate Change Impacts on Water Resources and Sustainable Water Management Strategies in North America”, Water Resources Management, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2771-2786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03474-4.
- AtlanticCouncil, (2016), Water Dispute Escalating between Iran and Afghanistan, Atlantic Council, https:// www. atlanticcouncil. org/ wpcontent/ uploads/ 2016/09/ Water_ Dispute_ Escalating_ between_ Iran_ and_ Afghanistan_web_0830.pdf.
- Bagherzadeh, S et al., (2024), “Normative Assessment of Enabling Factors for Adaptive Water Governance; Evidence and Lessons from the Hirmand River Basin, Iran”, Environmental Management, Vol. 73, No. 1, 144-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01896-9.
- Castro, J. E, (2007), “Water Governance in the Twentieth-first Century”, Ambiente and Sociedade, 73, No. 1, 97-118. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11269-023-03474.
- Cordner, A et al., (2019), “Guideline Levels for PFOA and PFOS in Drinking Water: The Role of Scientific Uncertainty, Risk Assessment Decisions, and Social Factors”, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, Vol. 29, No. 2, 157-171. https:// doi. org/ 10.1038/s41370-018-0099-9.
- Dombrowsky, I, (2009), “Revisiting the Potential for Benefit Sharing in the Management of Trans-boundary Rivers”, Water Policy, Vol. 11, No. 2, 125- 140. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2009.020.
- Farinosi, F; et al., (2018), “An Innovative Approach to the Assessment of Hydro-political Risk: A Spatially Explicit, Data Driven Indicator of Hydro-political Issues”, Global Environmental Change, Vol. 52, No. 1, 286-313. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. gloenvcha. 2018.07.001.
- Hussein, H; Menga, F; & Greco, F, (2018), “Monitoring Transboundary Water Cooperation in SDG 6.5. 2: How a Critical Hydropolitics Approach Can Spot Inequitable Outcomes”, Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 10, 3640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103640.
- Kåresdotter, E; Skoog, G; Pan, H & Kalantari, Z, (2023), “Water-related Conflict and Cooperation Events Worldwide: A New Dataset on Historical and Change Trends with Potential Drivers”, Science of the Total Environment, se, aprill, Vol. 868, No. 1, 161555. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j.scitotenv.2023.161555.
- Krampe, F, (2017), “Water for Peace? Post-conflict Water Resource Management in Kosovo”, Cooperation and Conflict, 52, No. 2, 147- 165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716652428.
- Liu, C; Yang, C; Yang, Q; & Wang, J, (2021), “Spatiotemporal Drought Analysis by the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) in Sichuan Province”, China, Scientific Reports, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1280. http:// creativecommons. org/ licenses/by/4.0/.
- Loodin, N & Warner, J, (2022), “A Review of Hydro-hegemonic Dynamics on the Transboundary Harirud River Basin: 2001– Present”, Water, 76, No. 1, 103007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103007.
- Mehdipour, S et al., (2022), “Impacts of Drought on Health: A Qualitative Case Study from Iran”, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 76, No. 1, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103007.
- Mustafa, D & Tillotson, M, (2019), “The Topologies and Topographies of Hydro-social Territorialisation in Jordan”, Political Geography, 70, No. 1, 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.01.011.
- Nagheeby, M; & Rieu-Clarke, A, (2020), Water Diplomacy in the Helmand River Basin: Exploring the Obstacles to Cooperation within the Shadow of Anarchy in Kittikhoun, A. and Schmeier, England: Routledge.
- Nagheeby, M & Warner, J, (2022), “The 150-year Itch: Afghanistan-Iran Hydropolitics over the Helmand/Hirmand River”, Water Alternatives, 15, No. 3, 551-573.
- Nagheeby, M & Warner, J, (2018), “The Geopolitical Overlay of the Hydropolitics of the Harried River Basin”, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economic, Vol. 18, No. 1, 839-860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9418-9.
- Nguyen, T. P. L; Virdis, S. G; & Vu, T. B, (2023), “Matter of Climate Change” or “Matter of Rapid Urbanization?”, Young People's Concerns for the Present and Future Urban Water Resources in Ho Chi Minh City Metropolitan area, Vietnam, Applied Geography, Vol. 153, No. 1, 102906, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102906.
- Sadoff, C. W & Grey, D, (2002), “Beyond the River: The Benefits of Cooperation on International Rivers”, Water Policy, Vol. 4, No. 5, 389- 403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00035-1.
- Song, M; Wang, R. & Zeng, X, (2018), “Water Resources Utilization Efficiency and Influence Factors under Environmental Restrictions”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 186, No. 1, 611-621. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j.jclepro.2018.02.259.
- Thomas, V & Warner, J, (2015), “Hydropolitics in the Harirud/Tejen River Basin: Afghanistan as hydro-hegemon”, Water International, 40, No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2015.1059164.
- Thomas, V; Azizi, M.A & Behzad, K, (2016), Developing Transboundary Water Resources: What Perspectives for Cooperation between Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan? Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, Kabul: Afghanistan.
- Warner, J et al., (2017), “Transboundary ‘Hydro‐hegemony’: 10 Years Later, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, Vol. 4, No. 6. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/wat2.1242.
- Wolf, A. T, (2007), “Shared Waters: Conflict and Cooperation”, Rev, Environ. Resour, Vol. 32, No. 1, 241-269. https:// doi. org/ 10.1146/ annurev. energy. 32.041006.101434.
- WPS, (2020), WPS Global Early Warning Tool September 2020 Quarterly Update. https://waterpeacesecurity.org/info/global-tool-update-September-2020
- Yar, F. G. M; Rahmani, M & Amir, E, (2023), “Identifying the Effective Factors and the Importance of the Harirud Watershed in Afghanistan and its Impact on Iran”, Randwick International of Social Science Journal, Vol. 2, No. 4, 254- 267. https://doi.org/10.47175/rissj.v4i2.668.
- Zeitoun, M. & Warner, J, (2006), “Hydro-hegemony–a Framework for Analysis of Trans-Boundary Water Conflicts, Water Policy, Vol. 8, No. 5, 435-460. https:// doi. org/ 10.2166/ wp.2006.054.