نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
تحول جنگ‌ها و شکل‌گیری گونه‌ای جدید از آن با عنوان جنگهای شبکه‌ای و نحوه بازدارندگی در برابر آن، تبدیل به دغدغه‌ای اساسی در میان کشورها شده است، اما ادبیات روابط بین‌الملل نسبت به این وضعیت پاسخگو نبوده یا پاسخ مناسبی ارائه نداده است. پرسش این است که بازدارندگی در برابر جنگهای شبکه‌ای چگونه خواهد بود؟ در پاسخ به پرسش اصلی، فرضیه مقاله این که بازدارندگی شبکه‌ای با تمرکز بر معادله قدرت متمرکز تهدید، با عنوان بازدارندگی شبکه‌ای تمرکزگرا، ابزاری کارآمد در برابر جنگهای شبکه‌ای محسوب می‌شود. برای بررسی این فرضیه از روش ابداکشن در قالب نظریه پیچیدگی آشوب بهره گرفته می‌شود. در این پژوهش، رفتار سیستم بین‌الملل در قالب سیستم‌های انطباقی پیچیده باز‌گفت می‌شود و با توجه به تغییر شکل نظم به نظم شاخه‌ای و دگرگونی‌های ایجاد شده به تبع آن، بازدارندگی شبکه‌ای تمرکزگرا به‌عنوان نمونه‌ای نوآورانه از موج ششم بازدارندگی مدل‌سازی می‌شود و کارآمدی آن در وضعیت کنونی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در شبکه منطقه‌ای غرب آسیا مورد بررسی قرار می‌گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Networked Wars and Deterrence, Case Study: Islamic Republic of Iran
نویسندگان [English]
- Seyedeh Maryam Mousavi 1
- Farhad Ghasemi 2
1 Ph.D Student, International Relations, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction
Deterrence is a system of conflict control in the international system that has undergone fundamental changes since the beginning of the Cold War. Following the 9/11 attacks and during the age of chaos, modern wars do erupt and affect all levels of interaction between actors. In this context, deterrence has lost its classical conceptualization and has become ambiguous and dysfunctional. The international system increasingly tends to behave like a complex adaptive system. Even the function of power dynamics in shaping conflict control systems seems to have transformed. Therefore, there is a need to develop a new deterrence model as a control system for modern warfare as one of the emerging phenomena in the international system. In this respect, the new generation of power dynamics possesses unique features and plays a fundamental role in the age of chaos. The present article aimed to answer the question of how networked wars impact deterrence in general and particularly in the context of the Islamic Republic of Iran. It intended to develop an appropriate deterrence model for controlling networked wars as the fourth generation of warfare within the chaotic–complex international system. To meet this objective, the study proposed intensive networked deterrence as an effective model for controlling networked wars.
Literature Review
The extensive literature on the topic can be categorized into four groups. The first group deals with the transformation of warfare in the chaotic–complex international system (e.g., Arquilla & Ronfeldt, 2001; Freedman, 2017; Henrotin, 2016; Krieg & Rickli, 2019; Levy & Thompson, 2011; Lind & Thiele, 2015; Moffat, 2003). The second group of studies examines deterrence and its evolution (e.g., Freedman, 2004; Kaufmann, 1954; Quackenbush, 2011; Snyder, 1960). Knopf (2010) recognized four waves in the evolution of deterrence from the beginning to the end of the Cold War. In addition, Prior et al. (2018) explain how the fifth wave, termed resilience deterrence, controls modern wars, and Ghasemi (2021) has introduced the sixth wave, called nonlinear deterrence. The third group of studies is concerned with the relationship between deterrence and modern wars (e.g., Kello, 2017; Sutherland, 2011; Whyte et al., 2020). Finally, the fourth group focuses on deterrence in the case of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Ghasemi, 2007, 2021, 2022; Gunzinger & Dougherty, 2011; Hicks & Dalton, 2017; Krepinevich et al., 2003). Despite the extensive research, the issue of networked wars remains underexplored in the literature on deterrence methods. This gap is particularly relevant for actors like the Islamic Republic of Iran, given its unique geopolitical situation. The present study aimed to address this gap by innovatively designing a new deterrence model specific to the case of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Materials and Methods
Given the uncertainty and emergent nature of the subject, the study relied on abductive reasoning to answer the research question. The process consisted of four steps. First, the emergent phenomena were explored and interpreted. Second, the deductive reasoning was used to conceptualize and theorize. Third, the inductive reasoning was used to conduct a case study investigation, followed by testing the validity and theoretical inferences through both inductive and deductive reasoning. This approach could provide the best explanation for the behavior of the complex international system as a complex adaptive system in the age of chaos, ultimately shaping the most functional deterrence model to control networked wars.
Results and Discussion
The study modeled the so-called intensive networked deterrence as a subdivision of the sixth wave of deterrence theory. The analysis also examined its impact on the current status of the Islamic Republic of Iran within the regional network of West Asia. Having introduced new concepts such as networked wars and intensive networked deterrence, the article explained how networked wars can be controlled by intensive networked deterrence, applied by the holder of intensive power. It examined how power dynamics within the chaotic–complex international system affect the control of modern wars and shape intensive networked deterrence. This kind of deterrence is an instrument used by those with intensive power at regional or international levels to create a threat equation through a cascading failure process. Considering the transformation of the international order from structural stability to bifurcated order, it is the holder of intensive power, rather than the holder of extensive power, that determines the structure and shape of the control system and create the threat equation. As the discussion made clear, intensive networked deterrence can be applied to the case of the Islamic Republic of Iran as a holder of intensive power within the regional network of West Asia. The hypothesis was tested using historical events involving the Islamic Republic of Iran, particularly from 2016 to 2023. To apply intensive networked deterrence to the Islamic Republic of Iran, specific requirements were pointed out, and several policies and actions were recommended.
Conclusion
Intensive networked deterrence is characterized by a multilayered structure with overlapping strategies resulting from the fluidity of threats. It relies on deterrence functions based on cascading failure processes, rolling feedback mechanisms, and broader communications within international or regional networks. This approach is marked by interactions and uncertainty at all levels. Intensive networked deterrence can effectively control networked wars, which have the potential to erupt at geopolitical, geoeconomic, geocultural, and geocyber levels. It underscores the importance of technology and modern knowledge in waging war, achieving final objectives, and targeting infrastructures, with a significant overlap of political and social environments. In an age of chaos and the second phase of the fourth generation of warfare, intensive networked deterrence can be employed by the holder of intensive power, such as the Islamic Republic of Iran within the regional network of West Asia.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Chaotic–complex International System
- Networked Wars
- Deterrence
- Intensive Power
- Intensive Networked Deterrence
- اعظمی، هادی و موسوی زارع، جواد، (1395)، «بررسی و تبیین اهمیت دریا از منظر موقعیت ژئوپلیتیکی ایران»، ماهنامه پژوهش ملل، دوره اول، شماره 7.
- قاسمی، فرهاد، (1386)، «نگرشی تئوریک بر طراحی مدل بازدارندگی سیاست خارجی ایران». فصلنامه بین‌المللی ژئوپلیتیک، دوره سوم، شماره 7.
- قاسمی، فرهاد، (1392)، نظریه‌های روابط بین‌الملل: بنیان‌های نظری رژیم‌های بین‌المللی و منطقه‌ای، تهران: نشر میزان.
- قاسمی، فرهاد، (1398)، «گامی به سوی نظریۀ نوین ژئوپلیتیک شبکه‌ای و بازتولید قدرت در سیاست بین‌الملل»، فصلنامه روابط خارجی، دوره 11، شماره 43.
- قاسمی، فرهاد، (1400)، «الزامات نظری بازدارندگی در سیستم‌های بین‌المللی پیچیدهآشوبی: گامی به سوی نظریه نوین بازدارندگی غیرخطی»، پژوهش‌های راهبردی سیاست، دوره 10، شماره 32. https://doi.org/10.22054/qpss.2021.61565.2863
- قاسمی، فرهاد، (1401)، قدرت و سیاست بین الملل، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
- نامی، محمد‌حسن و عباسی، علیرضا، (1388)، «تحلیل جایگاه ژئواکونومیک ایران در خاورمیانه»، فصلنامه بین‌المللی ژئوپلیتیک، دوره 5، شماره 15.
References
- Açıkalın, S. N., & Bölücek, C. A, (2014), “Understanding of Arab Spring with Chaos Theory – Uprising or Revolution”, In S. Banerjee, Ş. Ş. Erçetin, & A. Tekin (Eds.), Chaos Theory in Politics, London: Springer, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/9789401786911.
- Alterman, J, (2017), “Regional Perspectives on Iran”, In K. H. Hicks & M. G. Dalton (Eds.), Deterring Iran after the Nuclear Deal (p. 126), Center for Strategic and International Studies, https:// www. csis. org/ analysis/ deterringiranafternucleardeal.
- Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D, (2001), “The Advent of Netwar(Revisited)”, In (J. Arquilla & D. Ronfeldt (eds.)), Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy, RAND Corporation PP Santa Monica, CA, https://doi.org/10.7249/MR
- Awuzie, B., & McDermott, P, (2017), “An Abductive Approach to Qualitative Built Environment Research: A Viable System Methodological Exposé”, Qualitative Research Journal, 17(4), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ0820160048.
- Azad, T. M., Haider, M. W., & Sadiq, M, (2023), “Understanding Gray Zone Warfare from Multiple Perspectives”, World Affairs, 186(1), 81–104, https://doi/10.1177/00438200221141101.
- Bandow, D, (2022), Iran Could Collapse. Here’s What America Should Do, https:// www. cato. org/ commentary/ irancould collapse heres whatamericashoulddo.
- Bazoobandi, S, (2020), “Iran Nuclear Programme, a Brief History”, In S. Bazoobandi (Ed.), The New Regional Order in the Middle East Changes and Challenges, Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/9783030278854.
- Clausewitz, C. Von, (2010), On War Volume I(J.J Graham, Trans), Auckland, New Zealand: The Floating Press, https:// www. ebooks. com/enir/book/detail/634096.
- Czerwinski, T. J, (2003), Coping with the Bounds A NeoClausewitzean Primer, Washington DC: CCRP Publications, http:// www. dodccrp. org/ events/ 13th_ iccrts_2008/CD/library/html/pdf/Czerwinski_Coping.pdf.
- Defense Intelligence Agency, (2019), Iran Military Power: Ensuring Regime Survival and Securing Regional Dominance, https:// www. dia. mil/Portals/110/Images/News/Military_Powers_Publications/Iran_Military_Power_LR.pdf.
- Doughty, R. A, (1985), The Seeds of Disaster: The Development of French Army Doctrine, 191939. Archon Books, PA: Mechanicsburg.
- Dubowitz, M., & Kittrie, O, (2023), Strategy for a New Comprehensive U.S. Policy on Iran, https:// www. fdd. org/ analysis/ 2023/01/10/ strategyforanewcomprehensiveuspolicyoniran.
- Falk, R, (2018), Turkey and India in the Context of Foreign Aid to Africa, In E. Parlar Dal (Ed.), Middle Powers in Global Governance: The Rise of Turkey. Springer International Publishing, https:// link. springer. com/book/10.1007/9783319723655.
- Filippidou, A, (2020), “Deterrence: Concepts and Approaches for Current and Emerging Threats”, In A. Filippidou (Ed.), Deterrence: Concepts and Approaches for Current and Emerging Threats, London: Springer, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/9783030293673.
- Freedman, L, (2004), Deterrence / Lawrence Freedman, UK: Polity Press, Cambridge, https:// politybooks. com/ bookdetail/? isbn= 9780745631127.
- Freedman, L, (2017), The Future of War: A History, NYC: Public Affairs.
- Gray, C. S, (2003), “Maintaining Effective Deterrence”, Strategic Studies Institute US Army War College, https:// www. jstor. org/ stable/ resrep11365?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
- Gray, C. S, (2007), Fighting Talk: Forty Maxims on War, Peace, and Strategy, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, https:// www. nebraskapress.unl.edu/potomacbooks/9781597973076.
- Gunzinger, M., & Dougherty, C, (2011), OutsideIn: Operating from Range to Defeat Iran’s AntiAccess and AreaDenial Threats, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, https:// csbaonline. org/ research/ publications/outsideinoperatingfromrangetodefeatiransantiaccessandareadenial.
- Henrotin, J, (2016), The Art of War in the Network Age: Back to the Future. Wiley, https:// onlinelibrary. Wiley, com/ doi/ book/10.1002/9781119361312.
- Hicks, K. H., & Dalton, M. G, (2017), Deterring Iran after the Nuclear Deal (K. H. Hicks & M. G. Dalton (eds.)), Center for Strategic and International Studies, https:// www. csis. org/ analysis/ deterringiranafternucleardeal.
- Jervis, R, (1979), “Deterrence Theory Revisited”, World Politics, 31(2), 289–324, https://doi.org/10.2307/2009945.
- Jervis, R, (1989), “Rational Deterrence: Theory and Evidence”, World Politics, 41(2), 183–207, https://doi.org/10.2307/2010407.
- Kanat, S, (2021), “International System, Transformation of Terrorism and Chaos Theory”, In Ş. Ş. Erçetin, Ş. N. Açıkalın, & E. Vajzović (Eds.), Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2020: Application of Nonlinear Dynamics from Interdisciplinary Perspective. Springer International Publishing, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/9783030740573.
- Kaufmann, W. W, (1954), The Requirements of Deterrence, Center of International Studies Memorandum, No. 7, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. https://findit.library.yale.edu/catalog/digcoll:560733.
- Kello, L, (2017), The Virtual Weapon and International Order, Yale University Press, https:// yalebooks. yale. edu/ book/ 9780300220230/ virtualweaponandinternationalorder.
- Knopf, J. W, (2010), “The Fourth Wave in Deterrence Research”, Contemporary Security Policy, 31(1), 1–33, https:// doi. org/10.1080/13523261003640819.
- Krepinevich, A., Watts, B., & Work, R, (2003), Meeting the Anti Access and Area Denial Challenge, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, https:// csbaonline. org/ research/ publications/ a2adantiaccessareadenial/publication/1.
- Krieg, A., & Rickli, J. M, (2019), Surrogate Warfare: The Art of War in the 21st Century, Georgetown University Press, https: //lccn.loc.gov/2018043577.
- Landau, E. B, (2018), “In the Aftermath of the JCPOA: Restoring Balance in the USIran Deterrent Relationship”, In M. Litvak, E. B. Landau, & E. Kam (Eds.), Iran in a Changing Strategic Environment. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep17021.1.pdf.
- Lebovic, J. H, (2008), “Deterrence and Homeland Security: A DefensiveDenial Strategy Against Terrorists”, In E. Brimmer (Ed.), Five Dimensions of Homeland and International Security, Center for Transatlantic Relations, Johns Hopkins University, https:// www. google.com/url?
- Levy, J. S., & Thompson, W. R, (2011), The Arc of War: Origins, Escalation, and Transformation, University of Chicago Press, https:// press, uchicago. edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/A/bo12093854.html.
- Lind, W. S., & Thiele, G. A, (2015), 4th Generation Warfare Handbook, Castalia House, http:// infinity. wecabrio. com/ 95270657554 thgenerationwarfarehandbook.pdf.
- Mallory, K, (2018), New Challenges in CrossDomain Deterrence, RAND Corporation, https:// www. rand. org/ pubs/ perspectives/ PE259.html.
- Maull, H. W, (2019), “Global Disorder”, Uluslararasi İliskiler, 16(63), 3–12. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/uidergisi/issue/48814/621262.
- Mehmetcik, H, (2018), “Turkey and India in the Context of Foreign Aid to Africa”, In E. P. Dal (Ed.), Middle Powers in Global Governance: The Rise of Turkey. Springer International Publishing. https:// link. springer. com/book/10.1007/9783319723655.
- Moffat, J, (2003), Complexity Theory and Network Centric Warfare, DIANE Publishing Company, PA: Collingdale, http:// www. dodccrp. org/ files/Moffat_Complexity.pdf Morgan, P. M, (2003), Deterrence Now, Cambridge University Press, https:// www. cambridge. org/ core/ product/ identifier/9780511491573/type/book.
- Osinga, F., & Sweijs, T, (2020), NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2020: Deterrence in the 21st Century—Insights from Theory and Practice (F. Osinga & T. Sweijs (eds.); 1st ed.). T.M.C. Asser Press, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/9789462654198.
- Ottaway, M., et al., (2008), The New Middle East, https:// carnegieendowment. org/ files/ new_middle_east_final1.pdf.
- Prior, T., et al., (2018), Resilience: The ‘Fifth Wave’ in the Evolution of Deterrence (M. Z. Thränert Oliver (ed.); pp. 63–80), Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich, https://css.ethz.ch/en/publications/strategictrends/ html?id= /r/e/s/i/ resilience_ the_ fifth_ wave_ in_the _evoluti.
- Quackenbush, S, (2011), Understanding General Deterrence: Theory and Application, Palgrave Macmillan, NYC,US, https:// link. springer. com/ book/10.1057/9780230370791.
- Snyder, G. H, (1960), “Deterrence and Power”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4(2), 163–178, https:// doi.org/ 10.1177/ 002200276000400201.
- Staff, T, (2021), “Exnational Security Advisor Warns: Iran Has ability t harm Us Significantly”, https:// www. timesofisrael. com/ exnational securityadviserwarnsiranhasabilitytoharmussignificantly/amp.
- Sutherland, B, (2011), Modern Warfare, Intelligence and Deterrence: The Technologies that are Transforming Them (B. Sutherland (ed.)), The Economist Newspaper Ltd. https:// www. publicaffairsbooks. com/titles/ benjaminsutherland/modernwarfareintelligenceanddeterrence/ 9781610395120.
- Tomé, L., & Açıkalın, Ş. N, (2019), “Complexity Theory as a New Lens in IR: System and Change”, In Ş. Ş. Erçetin & N. Potas (Eds.), Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2017: Explorations of Chaos and Complexity Theory, Springer International Publishing. https:// link. springer. com/ book/10.1007/9783319898759.
- Whyte, C., et al., (2020), “Information Warfare in the Age of Cyber Conflict”, In C. Whyte, A. T. Thrall, & B. M. Mazanec (Eds.), Information warfare in the age of cyber conflict, Taylor & Francis. https://www.routledge.com/InformationWarfareintheAgeofCyberConflict/WhyteThrallMazanec/p/book/9781138600935.
- Zimmt, R, (2018), The Effect of Economic and Social Processes on Iranian Foreign Policy, In M. Litvak, E. B. Landau, & E. Kam (Eds.), Iran in a Changing Strategic Environment, https:// www. jstor. org/ stable/ pdf/resrep17021.1.pdf.
)