Islamic political thought, especially in the field of political theology, is deeply connected with concepts such as tolerance, tolerance, and violence. This research analyzes the views of Ayatollah Abdullah Javadi Amoli in this field. The main goal is to examine how his attitude is formed under the influence of objective and subjective contexts and Islamic norms. The key question is what is Javadi Amoli's attitude towards tolerance, tolerance, and violence in political theology? The hypothesis is that based on Islamic principles, he denies tolerance in doctrinal principles, justifies legitimate violence to repel/eliminate corruption, and accepts social pluralism within the limits of Sharia. (Background and Objective) The research method is Skinner's intentional hermeneutics. He considers Islam to be a "forgiving" law that is compatible with nature, but rejects tolerance in doctrinal principles. He justifies legitimate violence in the prevention evil (repelling corruption) and the implementation of limits (eliminating corruption) and accepts social pluralism for peaceful coexistence. Compared to Western (liberal, contractualist, critical) and Islamic (determinism-oriented, approaches, his approach is balanced and monotheistic. By difference), he emphasizes the necessity of rationality, dialogue, (Findings) Javadi Amoli considers mercy as the principle and decisiveness as the condition, presenting a model of non-violent, justice-oriented politics.