نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

بسیاری از تحلیلگران، قدرت­گیری جریانات پوپولیســـتی در اروپا را نماد و مُسَـــبِب ناپایداری و «گسست سیاست» اروپایی خوانده ­اند. ظهور سریع رهبران و احزاب پوپولیست در قدرت از میانه دهه 2000 تا سال‌های پایانی دهه 2010 نشان داد که شیوع و مقبولیت پوپولیسم به بالاترین حد خود در 30 سال گذشته رسیده است. به ­ویژه از سال 2016، به قدرت رسیدن احزاب و جنبش ­های پوپولیستی مخالف آموزه­های لیبرالیســـتی در اروپا و ایالات‌ متحده به نگرانی ­ها در خصوص گسترش شیوه ­های اقتدارگرایی سیاست در این کشورها دامن زده است. پرسش اصلی پژوهش این است که علل و زمینه ­های قدرت‌یابی جریانات پوپولیستی و به‌ویژه احزاب راست رادیکال در طی دو دهه گذشته در اروپا چه بوده است؟ یافته­های پژوهش با بهره­گیری از رویکردی بدیع در قالب نظریه «عرضه و تقاضا» پوپولیستی نشان می­ دهد که مطالبات و نارضایتی­ های 1- اقتصادی و 2- اجتماعی- فرهنگی در سَمت تقاضا (رویکرد پایین به بالا) و در مقابل، استراتژی ­ها و سازوکارهای سیاسی- نهادی بکار گرفته از سوی دولتمردان و احزاب پوپولیستی در سَمت عرضهِ سیاست­ های پوپولیستی (رویکرد بالا به پایین)، موجب روی­آوری رأی‌دهندگان اروپایی به رهبران و احزاب راست افراطی و فراهم شدن شرایط بسیج سیاسی شهروندان از سوی این احزاب شده است. روش پژوهش، کیفی از نوع تبیین علی و روش گردآوری داده ­ها کتابخانه ­ای است. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the Rise of Radical Right Parties in Europe (2008–2018): An Approach Based on Supply and Demand of Populism

نویسندگان [English]

  • Alireza Samiee Esfahani 1
  • Ehsan Jafarifar 2

1 Associate Professor, Political Science, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Ph.D Student, International Relation, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
The rise of the populist radical-right parties (PRRP) stands out as one of the most significant developments in Western democracies over the past two decades. This trend, seen as a challenging sign within democracy but against liberal democracy, highlights the mounting pressure faced by Western political regimes from forces and groups that diverge from the dominant political currents of the last two decades. More specifically, one of the trends in various regions of the EU is the fact that voters, disillusioned by traditional (EU) politics, are turning towards populist and extreme parties both on the left and the right. In this respect, the current research aims to address the question: What were the causes and underlying factors contributing to the rise of radical right parties to power in Europe over the last two decades?
Literature Review
In Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, Cas Mudde (2007) delved into the ideology of PRRPs. He identifies three core tenets, namely nationalism, authoritarianism, and populism, contending that PRRPs are not passive entities; rather, they are engaged in actively shaping their destiny within contemporary Western societies. In the article “Economic Insecurity and Demand of Populism in Europe,” Guiso et al. (2022) relied on the approach based on demand of populism to argue that market as well as government inefficiencies in providing security have eroded citizen trust in traditional political parties and institutions. The escalating threats of immigration and globalization have further heightened desperation and fear, contributing to the intensified demand for populist policies. Guiso et al. (2022) explain how this dual crisis, reflected in economic insecurity, systematically influences the demand for populism. In “Conditions Favouring Parties of the Extreme Right in Western Europe,” Jackman and Volpert (2017) conducted a comprehensive examination of systemic conditions influencing the electoral success of extreme right-wing parties in 16 Western European countries between 1970 and 1990. They concluded that factors such as the electoral system, party structure, and higher unemployment rates created a conducive environment for the emergence of such political movements. In addition, Dehshiri and Ghasemi (2015), in their article titled “Fourfold Crises and the Rise of the Radical Right in Europe,” posit that the four crises (i.e., resource distribution, representation, identity, and immigration) played an undeniable role in shaping the radical right movement in Europe.
The review of the literature shows different vantage points used to examine the causes, contexts, and consequences of the rise of radical right parties to power. There is a focus on particular aspects such as the electoral system, party structure, identity, and immigration. The novelty of the present research lies in its comprehensive approach based on supply and demand of populism, which explores a combination of socio-economic and political motivations and variables that impact the rise of radical right parties in European countries.
Materials and Methods
The present research used the supply and demand of populism as the framework to conduct a bottom-up and top-down analysis of the rise of radical right parties in Europe during 2008–2018.
Results and Discussion
Using the supply and demand of populism, the research can shed light on different dimensions of the rise of PRRPs in Europe during 2008–2018. On the demand side of populism, the ineffectiveness of governments in managing the financial crisis—often marked by cost reduction, tax increases, and rising unemployment—created the fertile ground for populist tendencies, including anti-immigrant sentiment, xenophobia, Euroscepticism, and nationalism. Meanwhile, the influx of immigrants into Europe, coupled with the adoption of multiculturalism in sociocultural spheres and globalization in the economic realm, could have contributed to the emergence and resurgence of radical right parties. On the supply side of populism, institutional mechanisms and political strategies (e.g., the nature of the electoral system, party ideologies, organizational structures of parties, and party leadership), alongside the influence of messages, rhetoric, and media propaganda, further laid the ground for the rise of radical right parties to power.
Conclusion
Relying on the supply and demand of populism as the framework, the present research demonstrated that economic and sociocultural demands and dissatisfactions on the demand side (bottom-up approach), coupled with the political and institutional strategies and mechanisms employed by populist statesmen and parties on the supply side of populism (top-down approach), prompted European voters to turn towards radical right leaders and parties. These conditions could foster the political mobilization of citizens by these parties, ultimately resulting in their rise to power, particularly between 2008 and 2018. Following the disorders such as the 2008 economic crisis, the 2014 terrorist crisis, the immigration crisis after 2015, and the ensuing sociocultural dissatisfaction, populist parties and leaders capitalized on the political opportunities available in the populism market, emerging as key players in the political arena. Concerning the supply of populism, radical right parties successfully provided the narratives necessary for political mobilization around shared concerns. They attracted the majority of votes by leveraging legal and institutional mechanisms (such as elections, media, and the unique leadership capabilities), ultimately securing political power.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Liberal Democracy
  • Populist Parties
  • Radical Right
  • Europe
  • Supply and Demand Approach
  • جعفری­فر، احسان؛ صالحی، حمید؛ ملکی، ایرج و الهی­نیا، میلاد، (1401)، «قدرت‌یابی راست افراطی و چالش‌های سیاست اروپایی»، فصلنامه مطالعات سیاست بین‌الملل، تابستان، دوره 2، شماره 2.
  • سمیعی اصفهانی، علیرضا، (1398)، «درآمدی‌ نظری ‌بر ‌مفهوم، ‌ماهیت ‌و عملکرد ‌پوپولیسم»، فصلنامه رهیافت­های سیاسی و بین­المللی، زمستان، دوره‌۱۱‌، شـماره‌ ۲.
  • سمیعی اصفهانی، علیرضا، (1401)، «اردوغانیسم؛ پوپولیسم به مثابه استراتژی سیاسی»، دو فصلنامه جامعه­شناسی سیاسی جهان اسلام، پاییز، دوره 10، شماره 21.  
  • مهتدی، ابوالفضل، (1397)، احزاب دست راستی و همگرایی اروپایی (با تأکید بر همگرایی اجتماعی و اقتصادی)، پایان‌نامه ارشد دانشگاه مفید قم، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی.
  • نصیری حامد، رضا و جعفری­فر، احسان، (1399)، «رابطه بحران اقتصادی و رشد حرکت‌های راست افراطی: مورد مجارستان، فصلنامه مطالعات اقتصاد سیاسی بین‌الملل، بهار و تابستان، دوره چهارم، شماره 1.
  • ورنرمولر، یان، (1396)، پوپولیسم چیست، بابک واحدی، جلد اول، چاپ اول، تهران: بیدگل.

 Refereces

  • Berman, Sheri, (2021), “The Causes of Populism in the West”, Annual Review of Political Science, Volume 24,   https:// www. annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102503.
  • Canovan, M, (1999), “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy”, Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 47, No. 1, doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00184.
  • Carter, Elisabeth L, (2005), The Extreme Right in Western Europe: Success or Failure, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • De Lange, S. L., & Art, D, (2011), “Fortuyn Versus Wilders: An Agency-based Approach to Radical Right Party Building”, Journal of the West European Politics, Vol. 34, No. 6.
  • Downs, A, (1957), “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 65, No. 2. doi: 10.1086/257897.
  • Eatwell, R, (2004), “The Re-birth of Right-wing Charisma? The Cases of Jean-Marie Le Pen and Vladimir Zhirinovsky”, Journal of Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, Vol. 3 , No. 3.
  • Figueira, F, (2018), “Why the Current Peak in Populism in the US and Europe? Populism as a Deviation in the Median Voter Theorem”, Journal of Government and Economics (EJGE),7, No.2.
  • Funke, M., Schularick, M. & Trebesch, C, (2016), “Going to Extremes: Politics after Financial Crises, 1870–2014”, Journal of European Economic Review, Elsevier, Vol, 88, No. 5553 doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.03.006.
  • Hall P, Taylor R, (1986), “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”, Journal of Political Study, Vol. 44, No. 5.
  • Hogan, J., & Haltinner, K, (2015), “Floods, Invaders, and Parasites: Immigration Threat Narratives and Right-wing Populism in the USA, UK and Australia”, Journal of Intercultural Studies, Vol. 36, No. 5, Doi: 10.1080/07256868.2015.1072907.
  • Inglehart R, Norris P, (2017), “Trump and Populist-authoritarian Parties: The Silent Revolution in Reverse”, Journal of Perspect, Politics ,Vol. 15, No. 2.
  • Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth, (2005), “The Vulnerable Populist Right Parties: No Economic Realignment Fuelling Their Electoral Success”, Journal of European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 44, No. 3.
  • Muis, J., & Immerzeel, T, (2017), “Causes and Consequences of the Rise of Populist Radical Right Parties and Movements in Europe”, Journal of Current Sociology, Vol. 65, No. 6.
  • Arzheimer, K., & Carter, E, (2006), “Political Opportunity Structures and Right‐wing Extremist Party Success”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 45, No. 3.
  • Hawkins, K. A., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C, (2017), “What the (Ideational) Study of Populism Can Teach Us, and what It Can't, Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 23, No. 4.
  • Krastev, Ivan, (2008), “Populism Today”, Aspen Institute, https:// www. wilsoncenter. org/event/populism-the-21st-century.
  • Kyle & Gultchin, (2018), “Populists Power Around the World”, available at:  http:// institute. global/ insight/ renewing- centre/ populists- power- around-world on November 7 2018oaded from http:// institute. global/ insight.
  • Jonge, L, (2019), The Success & Failure of Right-Wing Populist Parties in the Benelux, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cambridge.
  • Moffitt, B, (2015), “How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism”, Journal of Government and Opposition, 50, No. 2, doi: 10.1017/gov. 2014.13.
  • Mols, F., & Jetten, J, (2020), “Understanding Support for Populist Radical Right Parties: Toward a Model that Captures Both Demand-and Supply-side Factors”, Journal of Frontiers in Communication, 5, No. 83.
  • Mudde C, (2004), “The Populist Zeitgeist”, Journal of Government and Opposition, 39, No. 4, DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x.
  • Mudde, Cas, (2010), “The Populist Radical Right: A Pathological Normalcy”, Journal of West European Politics, 33, No. 6.
  • Mudde, C, (2012), The Relationship between Immigration and Nativism in Europe and North America, Migration Policy Institute, Https:// www. migrationpolicy.org/research/relationship-between-immigration-and-nativism-europe-and-north-america.
  • Mirza, M. N., & Azhar, H, (2021), “Why Democracies Give Rise to Populist Leaders?”, South Asian Journal of Contemporary Social Sciences, Vol. 3, No.1.
  • Müller, J. W, (2016), What is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Neuner, F. G., & Wratil, C, (2022), “The Populist Marketplace: Unpacking the Role of “Thin” and “Thick” Ideology”, Journal of Political Behavior, 44, No. 2.
  • Norris, P, (2005), Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Norris, P., & Inglehart, R, (2019), Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108595841.
  • Outten, H. R., Schmitt, M. T., Miller, D. A., & Garcia, A. L, (2012), “Feeling Threatened about the Future: Whites’, Emotional Reactions to Anticipated Ethnic Demographic Changes”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, No. 1.
  • Schroeder, R, (2018), Digital Media and the Rise of Right-wing Populism, Social Theory after the Internet: Media, Journal of Technology, and Globalization, Vol. 60, No. 81.‏
  • Reif, K.& Schmitt, H, (1980), “Nine National Second-order Elections: A Systematic Framework for the Analysis of European Elections Results”, Journal of Political Research, 8, No. 1.
  • Rodrik, D, (2018), “Populism and the Economics of Globalization”, Journal of International Business Policy, Vol. 1, No. 1, doi: 10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4.
  • Stoica, M. S, (2017), “Political Myths of the Populist Discourse”, Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 16, No. 46.
  • Taggart, Paul, (2004), “Populism and Representative Politics in Contemporary Europe”, Journal of Political Ideologies, Vol. 9, No. 3.
  • Tajfel H, (1970), “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination”, Journal of Scientific American, Vol. 223, No. 5.
  • Van der Brug, W., & Fennema, M, (2007), “Causes of Voting for the Radical Right”, Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol. 19, No. 4.
  • Viviani, Lorenzo, (2017), “A Political Sociology of Populism and Leadership”, Journal of Societàmutamentopolitica, Vol. 8, No. 15.
  • K, (1996), “Neo-Populismand Neo-Liberalism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities”, Journal of Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 32, No. 3.