نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بینالملل دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه روابط بینالملل دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار، گروه روابط بین الملل دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
چکیده
یکی از مشخصه‌های بارز شرایط کنونی بین‌المللی، رشد چین بعنوان یک قدرت بزرگ است. رشد قدرت چین برای حفاظت از منافع امنیتی به طور مستقیم با موقعیت بین‌المللی آمریکا گره خورده است؛ در نتیجه، تعامل راهبردی چین با آمریکا از مسائلی است که درک آن برای وضعیت آینده نظم بینالملل ضروری می‌‌نماید. این مقاله به بررسی الگوی رفتاری چین در قبال آمریکا تحت نظم تک‌قطبی می‌پردازد. از این‌رو پرسش این است که چه الگویی بر سیاست خارجی چین برای پیشبرد منافع و تعاملات راهبردی خود با ایالات متحده در نظم بینالملل کنونی حاکم است؟ یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که به ضرورت درهم‌تنیدگی قطبیت، عامل اقتصاد و درک تهدید؛ چین جهت پیشبرد منافع و تعاملات راهبردی خود با آمریکا، الگوی رفتاری دوگانه یعنی توانمندی‌های داخلی و موازنه نرم خارجی را در پیش گرفته است. مفهوم اول به تداوم تلاش‌های اقتصادی در کنار افزایش توانایی‌های نظامی اشاره دارد تا قدرت نسبی چین را افزایش دهد. در مفهوم دوم، رفتارهای موازنه‌طلبانه چین در سطح بین‌المللی در برابر آمریکا مورد توجه است. این امر بیشتر از طریق نهادهای چندجانبه و دیپلماسی اقتصادی صورت می‌گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Explaining the Chinese Pattern of Redefining International Order: Combination of Internal Capabilities and External Soft Balance
نویسندگان [English]
- Hossein Delavar 1
- Mohsen Eslami 2
- Masoud Mousavi Shafaee 2
- Mohammad Hosein Jamshidi 3
1 Ph.D Student, International Relations, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, International Relations, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, International Relations, Tarbaiat Modares, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
One of the distinguishing features of the current international situation is the growth of China as a great power. The growing power of China for protecting of security interests is directly tied to the US international position; As a result, China's strategic engagement with the US is one of the issues that is essential to understand the future state of international order. This article examines China's pattern of behavior toward the US under the unipolar order system. Hence, the question that the authors have tried to answer with a descriptive-analytical approach is that what pattern governs China's foreign policy to advance its interests, and strategic interactions with the US in the current international order? Findings show that due to the necessity of entangling polarity, economic factor and threat perception, China has adopted a dual pattern of behavior, like the domestic capabilities and external soft balance, in order to advance its strategic interests and interactions with the US. The first concept refers to the continuation of economic efforts along with increasing military capabilities to increase China's relative power. In the second concept, China's internationally balanced behavior toward the United States is considered. This is mostly done through multilateral institutions and economic diplomacy.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- US
- China
- Domestic Capabilities
- Soft Balance
- بوزان، بری و ویور، الی، (1388)، مناطق و قدرت‌ها: ساختار امنیت بینالملل، ترجمه رحمان قهرمانپور، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
- تقیزاده انصاری، محمد، (1396)، «چین از ثروت به توسعهطلبی دریایی»، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های روابط بینالملل، سال اول، شماره 22.
- چگنیزاده، غلامعلی، (1392)، «موازنه قوا و روابط راهبردی چین با ایالات متحده»، فصلنامه روابط خارجی، سال پنجم، شماره 4.
- لیتل، ریچارد، (1389)، تحول در نظریه‌های موازنه قوا، ترجمه غلامعلی چگنیزاده، تهران: انتشارات ابرار معاصر.
- والتز، کنت، (1392)، نظریه سیاست بینالملل، ترجمه روح‌الله طالبی‌آرانی، تهران: انتشارات مخاطب.
References
- Atanassova-Cornelis, Elena, (2016), “Strategic Concerns of the US and China, Regional Hedging and the Evolvingsecurity order in the Asia-Pacific”, Paper in ISA Asia-Pacific Conference.
- Beech, Hannah, (2012), “Did America Bond with China’s Heir Apparent, Vice President Xi Jinping?”, available at: http:// world. time. com/did-america-bond-with-chinas-heir-apparent-vice-presidentxi-jinping.
- Beim, David, (2011), “The Future of Chinese Growth”, New America Foundation, available at: http:// Roundtable. New net/ publication/policy/ the-Future-of-Chinese–Growth.
- Brawley, Mark, (2004), “The Political Economy of Power Balance Theory”, In Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21 st Century, eds by Paul, T.V, Wirtz, James J. & Michel Fortmann.
- Dawood, Layla, (2018), “China’s Military Modernisation: International Systemic Change through Internal Balancing?”, In Realism in Practice, eds by Davide Orsi, J. R. Avgustin & Max Nurnus.
- Feng, Yi, (2013), “Global Power Transitions and Their Implications for the 21 st Century”, Pacific Focus, Vol. 28, No. 2.
- Ferguson, Chaka, (2012), “The Strategic Use of Soft Balancing: The Normative Dimensions of the Chinese-Russian Strategic Partnership”, Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 35, No. 2.
- Gautam, Asshriti, (2014), “Alliance Politics in a Unipolar World”, IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19, Issue 3.
- Gill, Stephan, (2010), China's Soft Balancing Strategy and the Role of Resource Investment. Pear Fall/Winter.
- Ham, P. v, (2015), “The BRICS as an EU Security Challenge the Case for Conservatism”, Netherl&s Institute of International Relation, Clingendael, Clingendael Report.
- He, Kai. & Feng, Huiyun, (2008), “If Not Balancing then What? Reconsidering Soft Balancing and U.S. Policy Toward China”, Security Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2.
- He, Kai, (2009), “Dynamic Balancing: China's Balancing Strategies towards the United States, 1949-2005”, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 18, No. 58.
- Ikenberry, John, (2016), “Between the Eagle and the Dragon: America, China, and Middle StateStrategies in East Asia”, Political Science Quarterly, 131, No.1.
- Ikenberry, John & Lim, Darren J, (2017), “China's Emerging Institutional Statecraft, The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the Prospect for Counter-Hegemony”, Project on International Order and Strategy at Brookings.
- Ikenberry, John & Mastanduno, Michael & Wohlforth, William, (2009), “Introduction: Unipolarity, State Behavior, and Systemic Consequences”, World Politics, Vol. 61. No.1.
- Krauthammer, Charles, (2002/03), “The Unipolar Moment Revisited”, The National Interes, 70.
- Korany, Baghat, (2005), “The Middle East Since the Cold War: Torn between Geopolitics and Geoeconomics”, In Fawcett, Louise, International Relations of the Middle East, Oxford: Oxford UP.
- Lampton, DM, (2008), The Three Faces of Chinese Power: Might, Money, and Mind, Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
- O’Neill, John, (2001), “Building Better Global Economic BRICs”, Goldman Sachs, Global Paper 66.
- Pape, Robert, (2005), “Soft Balancing against the United States”, International Security, Vol. 30, No.1.
- Paul, T.V, (2005), “Soft Balancing in the Age of u.s Primacy”, International Security, Vol. 24, No.1.
- Perkins, Dwight, (2006), “China’s Recent Economic Performance and Future Prospects”, Asian Economic Policy Review, Vol. 1, 1.
- Posen, Barry, (1984), The Sources of Military Doctrines, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Piper, Laurence, (2015), “The BRICS Phenomenon: From Regional Economic Leaders to Global Political Players”, In Working Paper 3: BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies (BICAS) Conference, Cape Town, April.
- Saunders, Phillip C, (2013), “The Rebalance to Asia: U.S.-China Relations and Regional Security”, INSS Strategic Forum, 281.
- Song, Weiqing, (2013), “Feeling Safe, Being Strong: China’s Strategy of Soft Balancing Through the Shanghai Cooperation Organization”, International Politics, Vol. 50, No. 5.
- Shambaugh, Davi, (2003), Modernizing China’s Military: Progress, Problems, and Prospects, Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Wallsh, David, (2013), “Syrian Alliance Strategy in the Post-Cold War Era: The Impact of Unipolarity”, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 37, No.2.
- Walt, Stephen M, (2005), Taming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy, New York, London: www. Norton.
- Wang, Yuan-Kang, (2006), “China’s Grand Strategy and U.S. Primacy: is China Balancing American Power?”, The Brookings Institution.
- Wang, Yuan-kang, (2010), “China’s Response to the Unipolar World: The Strategic Logic of Peaceful Development”, Journal of Asian and African Studies, Vol. 45, No. 5.
- Wohlfort, William C. h, (1999), “The Stability of a Unipolar World”, International Security, 24, No.1.
- World Bank, (2018), GDP (Current US$), Available at: https:// data. worldbank. org/ indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD.
- Varisco, Andrea E, (2013), Towards a Multi-Polar International System: Which Prospects for Global Peace?, e-International Relations, Available at: <https:// www. e-ir. info/ 2013/ 06/03/towards-a-multi-polar-international-system-which-prospects-for-global-peace.
- Zeenews, (2012), China warns US against Asia-Pacific plans, June 5< http:// zeenews. india. com/news/world/china-warns-us-against-asia-pacificplans_ 779830.html.
)