نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه روابط بین الملل دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

2 دانشیار گروه روابط بین الملل دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

چکیده

بنیامین نتانیاهو اصلی‌ترین چهره صحنه سیاسی اسرائیل طی یک دهه گذشته به شمار می‌رود. از آنجایی که وی سهم مهمی در شکل دادن به رفتار و تصمیمات سیاست خارجی این رژیم در صحنه بین‌المللی داشته است، این پژوهش می‌کوشد سبک رهبری و خصایص شخصیتی وی را بعنوان یکی از عوامل تاثیرگذار و در عین حال مغفول مانده در تحلیل رفتار سیاست خارجی اسرائیل مورد بررسی قرار دهد. از این‌رو فرضیه اصلی مقاله این است که رفتار سیاست خارجی اسرائیل طی یک دهه گذشته بیشتر متاثر از نظام ادراکی و سبک رهبری بنیامین نتانیاهو بوده است. چارچوب مفهومی و روشی مورد استفاده، روش ‌تحلیل خصایص رهبری مارگارت هرمن با تکیه بر متغیر پیچیدگی مفهومی در آن است. نتایج این پژوهش که حاصل تحلیل محتوای کمی داده‌های گفتاری نتانیاهو طی بازه زمانی 2009 تا 2019 است، نشان می‌دهد سطح پایین پیچیدگی مفهومی و رویکرد سیاه و سفید به مسائل سیاست خارجی همراه با سطح بالای باور به توانایی کنترل رویدادها، تمایل بالا به قدرت و بی‌اعتمادی شدید به دیگران به رویکرد تهاجمی و بازصفتانه نتانیاهو در سیاست خارجی اسرائیل شکل داده است که نمود آن را می‌توان در بزرگ‌نمائی تهدید ایران و مخالفت با ایده تشکیل دولت مستقل فلسطینی مشاهده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of a Cognitive System of Political Elites on Israeli Foreign Policy: The Case of Benyamin Netanyahu

نویسندگان [English]

  • Javad Arabameri 1
  • Mohsen Eslami 2
  • Seyed Masoud Mousavi Shafaee 2
  • Mohammad Hosein Jamshidi 2

1 Ph.D. Candidate.Department of international relations, Tarbiat Modares University.Tehran.Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Benyamin Netanyahu has been the main figure in the Israeli political scene for the past decade. Since he has played a major role in shaping the Israeli foreign policy in the international arena, this study seeks to examine his leadership style and personality traits as an influential and at the same time a neglected factor in the foreign policy behavior of the state of Israel. Hence, the main hypothesis is the fact that Israel’s foreign policy behavior has been more influenced by Netanyahu’s cognitive system and leadership style. The conceptual/methodological framework used in this paper is Leadership Traits Analysis (LTA) proposed by Margaret G. Hermann with a focus on the Conceptual Complexity variable in this regard. The results of this study, which itself are the quantitative content analysis of Netanyahu’s verbal material from 2009 to 2019; suggest that BIBI’s low conceptual complexity and his black and white thinking to foreign policy with high belief in ability to control events, a high desire for power, and a strong distrust to others have shaped Netanyahu’s aggressive and hawkish approach to Israeli foreign policy, which can be seen in exaggerating the Iranian threat and opposing to the idea of a Palestinian independent state.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Netanyahu
  • Israel
  • Foreign Policy
  • Leadership Traits Analysis (LTA)
  • Conceptual Complexity
  • اسلامی، محسن، (1393)، سیاست خارجی اسرائیل، (چاپ دوم)، تهران: انتشارات امیرکبیر.
  • افتخاری، اصغر، (1380)، جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی اسرائیل، تهران: مرکز مطالعات علمی و پژوهش‌های استراتژیک خاورمیانه.

References

  • Bar Josef, Uri, (2001), Israel’s National Security toward 21st Century, London: Routledge.
  • Bard, Mitchell, G, (2007), Will Israel Survive?, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Beauchamp, Zack, (2016), The Ideas that Define Benjamin Netanyahu, VOX. Retrieved May 5, 2021 from https:// vox. com/ 2015/ 3/ 16/ 8220035/what-does-netanyahu-think
  • Ben-Zaken, A, (2018), The Father, The Son (Bibi) and the Spirit of Catastrophe, Haaretz. https://www.haaretz.com/.premium-the-father-the-son-and-the-spirit-of-catastrophe-1.5364937.
  • Bregman, A, (2016), Israel’s Wars: A History Since 1947 (4th Ed.), London: Routledge.
  • Carlstrom, G, (2017), How Long Will Israel Survive? The Threat from Within (1st Ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Caspit, B, (2015), “Netanyahu Backslides on Religious Reforms”, Al-Monitor: The Pulse of the Middle EastRetrieved April 8, 2021 from, https:// www. Almonitor, com/ originals/2015/07/ israel-netanyahu-religious-reforms-chief-rabbinate-orthodox.html.
  • Caspit, B., Cummings, O, (2017), The Netanyahu Years, New York: Thomas Dunne Books.
  • Cohen, E. A., Eisenstadt, M., & Bacevich, A. J, (1998), Knives, Tanks, and Missiles: Israel’s Security Revolution, Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
  • Dille, B., & Young, M. D, (2000), “The Conceptual Complexity of Presidents Carter and Clinton: An Automated Content Analysis of Temporal Stability and Source Bias”, Political Psychology, 21(3), 587–596, https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00206.
  • DYSON, S. B, (2006), “Personality and Foreign Policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq Decisions”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 2(3), 289–306, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00031.x.
  • Dyson, S. B, (2009), “Cognitive Style and Foreign Policy: Margaret Thatcher’s Black-and-White Thinking”, International Political Science Review, 30(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512108097055.
  • Dyson, S. B. & Raleigh, A. L, (2014), “Public and Private Beliefs of Political Leaders: Saddam Hussein in front of a Crowd and Behind Closed Doors”, Research & Politics, 1(1), 205316801453780, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168014537808.
  • Freilich, C. D, (2014), Zion’s Dilemmas: How Israel Makes National Security Policy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Hermann, M. G, (1980), “Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders”, International Studies Quarterly, 24(1), 7–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600126.
  • Hermann, M. G, (2002), Assessing Leadership Style: A Trait Analysis. Social Science Automation, Retrieved from https:// socialscience. net/ docs/LTA.pdf.
  • Hermann, Margaret, G, (2003), Assessing Leadership Style: Trait Analysis, In J. Post (Ed.), the Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders, Ann‌Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Hudson, V. M, (2013), Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory (2nd), Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Inbar, E, (2008), Israel’s National Security: Issues and Challenges since the Yom Kippur War, NewYork, NY: Routledge.
  • Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, (2015, September 7), PM Netanyahu’s Remarks on the Gas Outline, Retrieved from https://mfa.gov.il/MFA/PressRoom/2015/Pages/PM-Netanyahu’s-remarks-on-the-gas-outline-7-September-2015.aspx.
  • Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, (2016, September 6), PM Netanyahu Meets with Dutch PM Rutte, Retrieved from https:// mfa. gov. il/ MFA/ Press Room/2016/Pages/PM-Netanyahu-meets-with-Dutch-PM-Rutte-6-September-2016.aspx.
  • Katzir, N, (2019), The Decision Calculus of Benjamin Netanyahu, In A. Mintz & D. Adamsky (Eds.), How Do Leaders Make Decisions? Contributions to Conflict Management, Peace Economics and Development, 28(A), , Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Kimhi, S, (2001), Benjamin Netanyahu: A Psychological Profile Using Behavior Analysis, In O. Feldman, L. O. Valenty (Eds.), Profiling Political Leaders: Cross-Cultural Studies of Personality and Behavior, Westpoint, Connecticut: Praeger.
  • Kimhi, S., Yehoshua, S, (2017), “Behavior Analysis of Benjamin Netanyahu in 1999 and 2017: What has Changed?”, Ann Psychiatry Ment Health, 5(5), 1-10.
  • Leslie, J. G, (2017), “Netanyahu’s Populism: An Overlooked Explanation for Israeli Foreign Policy”, SAIS Review of International Affairs, 37(1), 75–82, https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2017.0006.
  • Levine, N., Young, M. D, (2014, August 14 - 17), Leadership Trait Analysis and Threat Assessment with Profiler Plus, Eighth International Lisp Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal, Canada, https:// www. nicklevine. org/ ilc2014/ pplus/talk.pdf .
  • Maoz, Z, (2006), Defending the Holy Land: A Critical Analysis of Israel’s Security and Foreign Policy, AnnArbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Melman, Y, (2020, August 25), Why Netanyahu Keeps his Cabinet in the Dark about Israel’s most Delicate Decisions, Haaretz, Retrieved from https:// www. haaretz. com/ opinion/.premium-why-netanyahu-keeps-his-cabinet-in-the-dark-about-israel-s-most-delicate-decisions-1.9097453.
  • Moughty, S, (2016, January 6), Eyal Arad: A “Messianic” Netanyahu, PBS. Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/eyal-arad-a-messianic-netanyahu/.
  • Pfeffer, A, (2018), Bibi: The Turbulent Life and Times of Benjamin Netanyahu (1st Ed.), London: Basic Books.
  • Preston, T, (2001), The President and His Inner Circle, NewYork, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Samsonov, G, (2019, August), “Netanyahu: More a Jabotinsky than a Begin or a Ben Gurion (No. 1258)”, BESA Center Perspectives Paper, https://besacenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/1258-Netanyahu-More-of-a-Jabotinsky-Samsonov-English-final.pdf .
  • Siniver, A. & Featherstone, C, (2020), “Low-conceptual Complexity and Trump’s Foreign Policy”, Global Affairs, 6(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2020.1734953.
  • Sneh, E, (2005), Navigating Perilous Waters: An Israeli Strategy for Peace and Security (1st Ed.), London: Routledge.
  • Suedfeld, P., Guttieri, K. & Tetlock, P. E, (2003), “Assessing Integrative Complexity at a Distance: Archival Analyses of Thinking and Decision Making”, In J. Post (Ed.), the Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders, , AnnArbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Tal, I, (2000), National Security: The Israeli Experience (Praeger Security International), Praeger.
  • Times of Israel, (2016, April 4), Netanyahu the “Worst Manager,” Kept Changing his Mind, Spymaster Said before he Died, Retrieved from https:// www. timesofisrael. com/ netanyahu-the-worst-manager-spymaster-said-before-he-died/.
  • Yang, Y. E, (2010), “Leaders’ Conceptual Complexity and Foreign Policy Change: Comparing the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush Foreign Policies toward China”, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3(4), 415–446. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ cjip/poq015.
  • Ziv, G, (2011), Cognitive Structure and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Decision to Talk to the PLO, International Relations, 25(4), 426–454. https:// doi. org/ 10.1177/0047117811404580.