Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Political Science, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Political Science, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
In the field of marketing, the most desirable scenario involves the company maintaining an optimal level of market share with an increasing trend over time, as well as preventing any decline or reduction in the market share. Concerning political marketing and elections, there is even more necessary to have such a favorable scenario. Based on the significance of customer retention, this approach maintains that a party can win if it secures the largest market share while minimizing customer attrition. It seems to be an essential approach given the nature of political marketing characterized by the intense competition among political parties, the unavoidable impact of social media, the uncertainty about fulfilling campaign promises, and the risky nature of political transactions (cash vs. credit imbalance) —all of which can contribute to the vulnerability of political marketing, hence a declining trend in the voter turnout. Relationship marketing, as a modern marketing technique, can help political activists to mitigate these challenges, offering effective solutions to minimize campaign costs and increase the likelihood of success in elections. Political relationship marketing has been the subject of inquiry in several studies (e.g., Afjeh’i & Khademi-Garashi, 2016; Talari & Mousavi-Shafaei, 2015). Rizan et al. (2014) delved into the impact of relationship marketing on customer loyalty.
A declining trend in the number of electoral votes is one of the challenges faced by political parties in Iran. The issue appears to be rooted in their marketing strategies. In fact, political marketing strategies can potentially present a persuasively alluring image of the candidate’s integrity and virtue while covering up their flaws. Consequently, the politician who has been getting promoted is often perceived as an ideal figure. In most cases, voters may not understand the techniques used in campaigns, succumbing to the persuasive tactics employed by the candidate and thus increasing the likelihood of making a mistake in their choice and experiencing early regret. In fact, insufficient knowledge about the candidate or party contributes to such mistakes on the part of voters. Moreover, the inability to retain voters, driven by factors such as a loss of trust and unfulfilled promises, can result in costly and sometimes irreparable damages to political parties. Considering the drawbacks of short-term marketing in the political arena for those involved and the political parties’ desire for sustained power, relationship marketing seems to be a suitable approach to address the shortcomings without compromising market share, fulfill political parties’ electoral aspirations (e.g., frequent wins), and to ensure that voters get to know candidates and political parties adequately and accurately. In this line, the present research investigates the influential factors in political relationship marketing, addressing the following questions: Can relationship marketing help overcome the challenges in political elections? And what factors are influential in establishing and maintaining the relationship?
Materials and Methods
There are numerous factors behind party wins in the electoral market. However, according to the theoretical framework of this research, establishing and maintaining a robust relationship between parties and voters, leading to voter loyalty, plays a pivotal role in the electoral success of political parties. Relying on a multi-stage conceptual model, the present study aimed to investigate the connection between relationship marketing and the success of parties in the political market and electoral contests. The study is located within the intersection of political science and marketing management. As an applied research involving field work, it adopted a descriptive–survey, correlation-based approach to investigate the research questions. First, the analysis focused on the effect of relationship marketing variables (i.e., commitment, fulfillment of promises, communication, competence, and trust) on satisfaction. The second step involved examination of the effect of satisfaction on voter loyalty. Finally, the research explored the correlation between loyalty, recommendations to others, and revoting, as influential factors contributing to the success of political parties. In the data analysis, the Pearson coefficient and the correlation coefficient were used to understand the relationships between the research variables.
Results and Discussion
The research findings indicated a significantly direct correlation between relationship marketing principles and voter satisfaction. The results of regression analysis demonstrated that these principles can predict satisfaction. There was also a significant relationship between satisfaction and loyalty, as well as between loyalty and both revoting and recommendation to others. Finally, a significant relationship was observed between success and revoting and recommendation to others.
Conclusion
The research results confirm that the success of political parties hinges on both retaining existing voters and attracting new ones. This process involves distinct stages: generating satisfaction by applying relationship marketing principles, enhancing and transforming satisfaction into loyalty and fandom through the practical implementation of the principles, adopting fan-driven marketing as a result of the loyalty cultivated, and finally giving recommendations to others. The first and second stages are executed through strategic planning and initiatives of strategists, along with the genuine and reassuring conduct of candidates and party executive agents. The third and fourth stages, on the other hand, rely on the active participation of party loyalists and supporters. Furthermore, two practical methods can be employed to attract new voters: direct and indirect recruitment. In the direct recruitment, the party itself leverages relationship marketing principles to draw in a collective of voters. In contrast, the indirect recruitment is facilitated by party loyalists and supporters—mostly represented by previous voters—and their efforts to embark on fan-driven marketing and give recommendations to other voters.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  • Akhwan Kazemi, Bahram, (2002), Justice in the Islamic Political System, Tehran: Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought.
  • Akhwan Kazemi, Bahram, (2008), “Justice Discourse in the Ninth State”, Political Knowledge, July, Year 1, No. 2.
  • Ashuri, Mohammad, (2004), Human Rights and Concepts of Equality, Tehran: Publications of Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran.
  • Azimi Dolatabadi, Amir, (2007), Conflicts of Political Elites and Political Stability in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ch1, Tehran: Publications of the Islamic Revolution Center.
  • Bashirieh, Hossein, (2002), A Preface on the Political Sociology of Iran During the Islamic Republic Period, Tehran: Negah Masares Publication.
  • Berlin, Izia, (2000), Four Essays about Freedom, Translation by Mohammad Ali Movhed, Tehran: Kharazmi Publications.
  • Eslami, Shahla, (2007), “Evolution of Rawls' Theory of Justice from Moral Justice to Political Justice”, Philosophical Essays Quarterly, April, No. 13.
  • Hashemi, Seyed Mohammad, (2016), Fundamental Rights of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Vol. 2, Tehran: Judicial Gazette.
  • Imam Jumezadeh, Seyed Javad & Milani, Jamil, (2018), “Political Justice Indicators and Strategies for Its Realization”, Specialized Scientific Journal of Political Research, Ardibehesht, Year 1, Number 1.
  • Jafari, Abdullah, (2013), An Introduction to the Theory of Justice in Islam, Qom: Al-Mustafa International Translation and Publishing Center.
  • Jamalzadeh, Naser, (2007), “Political and Social Justice in Three Jurisprudential, Philosophical and Sociological Approaches”, Political Science Journal, Autumn and Winter, No. 8.
  • Khorramshad, Mohammad Baqir & Saveh Daroudi, Mustafa, (2012), “Justice in the Thought of Islamic Thinkers, Comparative Comparison of the Opinions of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution and Martyr Motahari”, Research Security Quarterly, Year 11, No. 40.
  • Kikha, Najmeh, (2016), Social Justice, Tehran: Young Thought Center.
  • Lakzaei, Najaf, (2008), Ayatollah Motahari's Political Thought, Qom: Bostan Kitab.
  • Mir Ahmadi, Mansour, (2007), Freedom in the Political Philosophy of Islam, Qom: Bostan Kitab.
  • Mirahmadi, Mansour & Shiri, Akram, (2008), “Political Justice in the Discourse of Islamic Political Jurisprudence”, Ministry of Science Promotion Quarterly, No. 48.
  • Motahari, Morteza, (2008), Adl Elahi, Tehran: Sadra.
  • Mousavi, Jamaluddin, (2004), Social Justice in Islam, Tehran: Contemporary Cultural Institute of Knowledge and Thought.
  • Nadai, Mohammad Ali, (2009), Justice in the Discourse of the Islamic Revolution, Qom: Bostan Ketab Institute.
  • Narimani, Amir Reza, Vaezi, Reza, Alwani, Seyed Mehdi, Ghorbani zadeh, Vajehullah, (2016), “Identification of External Factors and Obstacles of the University in the Commercialization of Humanities Researches”, Management and Development Process, Spring, Vol. 30, No. 1.
  • Nira Chandouk, (2009), Civil Society and Government, Translated by Feridon Fatemi, Tehran: Nahr-e-Karzan.
  • Rawls, John, (2012), Theory of Justice, Translation by Mohammad Kamal Sarwarian, Morteza Bahrani, Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural and Social Studies.
  • Roshe, Gay, (2013), Social Changes, Translated by Mansour Vathouqi, Tehran: Ney Publication.
  • Sarabadani Tafarshi, Jasin & Khameshadi, Adel, (2016), “Conceptual Explanation of the Theory of Social Justice in the Thought of Martyr Sadr”, Naqd and Nazar, Mardad, No. 2.
  • Shariat, Farshad, (2007), Examining the Theoretical Dimensions of Justice in the Political Discourse of Islam and the West, Tehran: Imam Sadegh University (AS).
  • Tagvi, Mohammad Asif & Jabri, Ali, (2014), “Comparative Study of Martyr Sadr's and John Rawls' Theories of Justice”, Marfat, August, No. 218.
  • Tawana, Mohammad Ali, (2009), “John Rawls' Theory of Political Justice: A Solution to the Two-Faced Enigma of Liberty and Equality”, Theoretical Politics Research, Summer and Fall, Vol. 1, No. 8.
  • Vaezi, Ahmad, (2013), Criticism of Theories of Justice, Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute.