Political Strategic Studies

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

Cost of Arbitration and Printing

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Process

Referees

Referees 2020

Referees 2021

Referees 2022

Referees 2022

Corruption Syndrome and Fragile Bureaucracy in Transitional Societies

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 ph. d student, translation of the political science departmant,Science and Resarch Branch, Islamic Azad University, Thran, Iran.

2 Associate professorm ,department of Political sciences, lssues of iran faculty of low, theology and political Science,Science and Resarch Branch, Islamic Azad University, Thran, Iran.

3 professorm ,department of Political sciences, lssues of iran faculty of low, theology and political Science,Science and Resarch Branch, Islamic Azad University, Thran, Iran.

Abstract

This article aims to understand the nature and causes of reproducing bureaucratic corruption in transitional societies from the legal sociology view point. According to the authors, since the operation of bureaucratic system firstly is determined by the nature of power elites and the present structural relationships in the society; on this basis, the protector-nurturing mentality and surveillance lacking of dominant elites alongside lacking rule of law is the pivotal factor of growing corruption in transitional societies. This dilemma gradually leads to forming an anomic situation in various structures of bureaucracy and changing it into an arena for rent-based games and thus, causes the process of development to wane and accordingly, causes the society to involve mentally and morally in contradiction and turmoil and from the perspective of political economy subject to increasing passivity and devolution. The final resultant of this situation is social capital crisis and vulnerability in human capital. The article with an expressive approach and in the mold of combination of various sociological theories shows why and how bureaucratic corruption in transitional societies continues reproduction, and finally deals with the foundations of an anticorruption policy and its implications.  

Keywords

References
الف- فارسی
-     بیتهام، دیوید؛ کوین بویل، (1376)، دموکراسی چیست؟، ترجمة شهرام نقش تبریزی، تهران: انتشارات ققنوس.
-   چلپی، مسعود، (1383)، چارچوب مفهومی پیمایش ارزش­ها و نگرش­ها و نگرش­های ایرانیان، تهران: سازمان چاپ و انتشارات وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی.
-     گیدنز، آنتونی، (1386)، جامعه­شناسی، ترجمة حسن چاوشیان، تهران: نشر نی.
-     رزاکرمن، سوزان، (1385)، فساد و دولت: علت­ها، پیامدها و اصلاح، ترجمة منوجهر صبوری، تهران: پردیس دانشگاه شیرازه.
-   سافر، دبلیو، جی، (1378)، «رسوم اخلاقی» در: نظریه­های بنیادی جامعه­شناختی، جمع‌آوری از لوئیس کوزر و برنارد روزنبرگ، ترجمة فرهنگ ارشاد، تهران: انتشارات نی.
-   ستاری، سجاد، (1390)، «پارادایم قدرت» به مثابه رهیافت نظری جدید و جایگزین نظریات «دولت» و «نظام سیاسی»، پژوهشنامه علوم سیاسی، سال ششم، شماره 3.
-   مارش، دیوید و استوکر، جری، (1384)، روش و نظریه در علوم سیاسی، ترجمه امیرمحمد حاجی یوسفی، چاپ دوم، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
-   نلسون، جان­ام، (1379)، «مشارکت سیاسی» در: درک توسعه سیاسی، از مایرون وایز و ساموئل هانتینگتون، ترجمة پژوهشکده­ مطالعات راهبردی، تهران: انتشارات پژوهشکده­ مطالعات راهبردی.
 
ب- انگلیسی
-  Argyriades, Demetrios, (2006), “Good Govermance, Professionalism, Ethics and Responsibility”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 72, No. 2.
 -  Amnuldsen, Inge, (2000), “Corruption: Defintions and Concepts” Chr. Michelsen Institute Development Studies and Human Rights. Amnuldsen- etico.liep.unesco.org.
 -  Andereev, Svetlozar, (2005), Corruption, Legitimacy and Quality of Democracy inLatin America and Central and Eastern Europe, London: Centre, Centre for Study of Democracy, University of Westminster. Beetham, David, (2006), “Political Legitimacy”, in the Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, ed. Kate Nash and Alan Scott, Oxford, Blackwell, 107- 117.
 -  Bunge, Mario, (2009), Political Philosophy: Fact, Fiction, and Vision, New Jersey: Transac-tions Publishers, Catterberg, Gabriela; Moreno, Alejandro, (2005), “The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol.18, No. 1.
 -  Desta, Yemane, (2006), “Designing Anti-Corruption Strategies for Developing Countries: A Country Study of Eritrea”, Journal of Developing Societies, Vol. 22, No. 4.
 -  Girling, John, (2002), Corruption, Capitalism and Democracy, London: Rutledge.
  -  Hung, E. K.; Sherman, Howard J, (1978), Economics (An Introduction to Traditional and Radical Views), New York: Harper and Row.
 -  Jong-Sung, You, (2005), Corruption and Inequality as Correlates of Social Trust: Fairness Matters More than Similarity, The Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations and the John F. Fennedy School of Government Harvard University.
 -  Jong-Sung, You; Khagram, Sanjeev, (2005), “A Comparative Study of Inequality and Corruption”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 70.
-  Kohn, Marek, (2008), Trust (Self- Interest and the Common Good), Oxford University Press.
 -  Lambsdorff, Johann and Michael Schinke, (2002), “Non- Benevolent Central Bank”, Center for Globalization and Europeanization of the Economy, Universities Goettingen, Discussion Paper 16.
 -  Levine, David P, (2005), “The Corrupt Organization”, Human Relations, Vol. 58, No. 640.
 -  Mcpherson, Charles; Macsearaigh, Stephen, (2007), “Corruption in the Petroteum Sectov”, In the Many Faces of Corruption, ed. J. Edgardo Campos and Sanjay Pradhan, Washington, DC., The World Bank.
 -  Nicholls, Colin; Daniel, Tim; Polaine, Martin; Hatchard, John, (2006), Corruption and Misuse of Public Office, Oxford University Press.
 -  Nicholson, M, (1996), “The Continued Significance of Positivism” in Smit et al, Rose-Ackerman, Susan; Kunicova, Jana, (2009), “Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constants on Corruption”, Corruption, Development and Institutional Design, ed. Janos Kornai, Laszlo Matyas and Gerad Roland, New York, Palgrave, 3-24.
 -  Rose-Ackerman, Susan, (2008), “Corruption and Government”, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 15, No. 3.
 -  Rose-Ackerman, Susan, (1999), Corruption and Government, Cambridge University Press.
 -  Shen, ce; Williamson, John. B, (2005), “Corruption, Democracy, Economic Freedom and State Strength: A Cross-National Analysis”, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Vol. 46, No. 4.
 -  Sztompka, Piotr, (1999), Trust (A Sociological Theory), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 -  Vanhanen, Tatu, (2000), “A New Dataset for Measuring Democracy (1810-1998)”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 37, No. 2.
 -  Lukes, Steven, (1977), Emile Durkheim (His Life and Work: A Historical and Critical Study), New York: Penguin Books.
 
 
Political Strategic Studies
Volume 9, Issue 34 - Serial Number 64
October 2020
Pages 209-242
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics