hossein farzanepour; Ali akbar yari alghar; sakineh shabani
Abstract
The foundation of public opinion these days is the emergence and decline of the ISIS movement. In this article, along with a charismatic reading of the emergence and decline of ISIS, the special two-sided work of charisma has been considered in terms of its accomplishments, while distinguishing it from ...
Read More
The foundation of public opinion these days is the emergence and decline of the ISIS movement. In this article, along with a charismatic reading of the emergence and decline of ISIS, the special two-sided work of charisma has been considered in terms of its accomplishments, while distinguishing it from its Muslim alternative, the spiritual saintship, the half-darkness of charisma has also been taken into consideration. The dominant approach of the existing articles is the attraction of the Prophet and the spiritual saintship in the Shiite system as a kind of charisma. If we understand the love of the saintship in the Shiite thought of charisma, then we have unwittingly accepted the necessity of the charisma's identity, its decline and its replacement after decades. The theoretical purpose of the article is to study the charisma of the charisma compared to the alternative of the spiritual saintship in the Shiite system, and its strategic goal is to examine the reason for the early decline of ISIS with the reasoning of Max Weber's theorizing, and the practical purpose is to examine the rational possibility of the emergence of an alternative to ISIS. Theoretical result of this paper, the superiority of the spiritual saintship over charisma and its most strategic and strategic finding, is the rational probability of the emergence of a quasi-ISIS movement. The research methodology is an analytical, critical paper, using library resources and the efficiency of Max Weber's theorizing, Kolakovsky and Hannah Arendt.
Abstract
Separation or closeness of Politics and administration is the key or principle place for production of knowledge in public administration area and scopes. In scientific societies of public administration, the degree of politics’ interference in administration named or called "politicization". On ...
Read More
Separation or closeness of Politics and administration is the key or principle place for production of knowledge in public administration area and scopes. In scientific societies of public administration, the degree of politics’ interference in administration named or called "politicization". On the other hand, it is so obvious that there is a degree of politicization in all administrative systems of world’s countries or administrations and there is no country in that, public administration does not execute politicians’ likes. Related to the professionalization degree of bureaucracy, adherence to political wishes is variable. The final purpose of this article is the comparative study and survey of politicization in six European and orth American countries. In this study Researchers using comparative method try to answer these questions, what are the concept, processes and consequences of politicization in Denmark, Germany, France, Britain, United States and Egypt. At the end, politicization in Iran has been viewed that can be a guideline in the international era for our domestic administrators.