Seyyed Mohammad Tabataba'i; amir jafarzadegan
Abstract
The State has for centuries been the only actor of the international system. After the end of the Second World War II, theoretical foundations and some practical facts led to the erosion of statehood and the emergence and diversification of new actors in the international arena. New actors recognized ...
Read More
The State has for centuries been the only actor of the international system. After the end of the Second World War II, theoretical foundations and some practical facts led to the erosion of statehood and the emergence and diversification of new actors in the international arena. New actors recognized in the anti-realist views of international relations including liberalism and its branches and theories such as postmodern and by designing concepts such as global civil society, transnationalism, globalization and soft power, make the changes in the form and nature of international relations. In addition to, some practical realities such as the permeability of state sovereignty and the development of new subjects such as human rights and the environment have accelerated this change. It has been made to highlight the role of sub-state actors in foreign policy. The foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran is also influenced by some actors in different ways. How did these influences occur? After studying the sub-states actors, identify their ways of influence on the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran through Participation in public diplomacy of the country, The promotion of Iranian-Islamic culture, Humanitarian measures, Normalization, Signing Agreements, and technical-commercial exchanges.
Seyd Mohammad Tabatabae'i; Milad Toopchi
Volume 4, Issue 13 , October 2015, , Pages 119-146
Abstract
Intellectual foundations and theoretical principles of the parties in the process of policy-making are of particular importance. So that,the effects of these principles could be seen during operational policies and observed in practices. Both reformists and fundamentalists parties inserted their ideological ...
Read More
Intellectual foundations and theoretical principles of the parties in the process of policy-making are of particular importance. So that,the effects of these principles could be seen during operational policies and observed in practices. Both reformists and fundamentalists parties inserted their ideological and intellectual principles as inputs in the foreign policy system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. After analysis in the system, which has its own set of principles and rules certain policies are carried out. By comparing the inputs that two parties inserted to the system and outputs that appeared we understand methods of two parties were different about the nuclear program but according to the general foreign policy principles of the system of Islamic Republic of Iran, their goal was identical. The purpose of this article is to review and analyze reformists and fundamentalists methods to achieve Peaceful nuclear program according to the system theory.
Seid Mohammad Tabatabaei; Ali Soleimani
Volume 2, Issue 7 , December 2014, , Pages 93-123
Abstract
Conflicts between Islamic Republic of Iran and The Zionist regime has longbeen studied from the various perspectives of International Relations.Perspectives such as Constructivism, Realism, Regional Balance of Power, aresome of these perspectives. In other works geopolitical status, ideological,geostrategic, ...
Read More
Conflicts between Islamic Republic of Iran and The Zionist regime has longbeen studied from the various perspectives of International Relations.Perspectives such as Constructivism, Realism, Regional Balance of Power, aresome of these perspectives. In other works geopolitical status, ideological,geostrategic, and geocultural problems have been considered by scholars andresearchers. But in this article, it has been tried to study each one of thesegovernments as a normative value system which attempt to expand and spreadits own norms and values in the international space. Therefore, the mainquestion of this paper seeks to explore the factors that lead to negativeperspective between the two. In fact, it can be argued that the expanded valuesystem of each government caused bankruptcy of norms of the other in theinternational system. In other words, the spreading norms of each one of thesetwo opposite value systems will guarantee the survival of that government ininternational system and limit the breathing space of the opponent.
